Preview

Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science

Advanced search

Fungicides to protect narrow-leafed lupine against anthracnose and other diseases

https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2022-4-5

Abstract

   The results of laboratory and field studies of fungicide effectiveness of Abacus Ultra, SE (suspension emulsion) and Optimo, EC (emulsion concentrate) against anthracnose pathogen and other lupine diseases are presented. The work was conducted in 2019-2021 in the Bryansk region.

   The object of study were the seedlings and crops of narrow-leafed lupine of the Vityaz variety.

   Under laboratory conditions, the effectiveness of Abacus Ultra (pyraclostrobin 62.5 g/l + epoxiconazole - 62.5 g/l) was studied at the rates of 1.25; 1.5; 2.0 l/ha and Optimo (pyraclostrobin - 200 g/l) - 0.5; 1.0; 1.5 l/ha. Biological effectiveness of the protective and therapeutic properties of fungicides was carried out according to the number of affected seedlings grown in paper-polyethylene rolls compared with the control (no treatment). The highest biological effectiveness of protective and curative properties of Abacus Ultra (98.7 and 97.0 %) and Optimo (97.7 and 93.1 %) against anthracnose showed the norms 2.0 and 1.5 l / ha. Field trials of Abacus Ultra and Optimo at the rates of 2.0 and 1.5 l/ha, respectively, were conducted in the experimental field of the ARLSRI under natural manifestation of anthracnose. The experiment was set in 4-fold repetition, the area of the plot was 34 m2. The seeding rate was 1.2 million germinated seeds/ha. The forecrop was presented by spring cereal crops. Crops were treated with a hand sprayer at the rate of 200 l/ha of the working solution. The effectiveness of fungicides was determined in comparison with the control. The biological efficacy of Abacus Ultra and Optimo against anthracnose was 95.3 and 96.3%, respectively. By the shiny bean phase, the number of beans affected by anthracnose in these variants was 1.7 and 1.2 %, compared to 18.7 % in the control. Plant infestation with fusarium blight decreased from 20.2% in the control to 10.9 % and 9.3 %. The spread of blossom blight on beans was reduced by 1.7 times. Fungicides had no inhibitory effect on plant growth. Significant (LSD05 = 0.28) increase in seed yield was 0.82 and 0.98 t/ha, cost recovery was 2.83 and 2.40 rubles.

About the Authors

L. I. Pimokhova
Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology
Russian Federation

Ludmila I. Pimokhova, Candidate of Science in Agriculture, Lead Researcher

The All-Russian Lupin Scientific Research Institute, branch

Bryansk region

Michurinsky



G. L. Yagovenko
Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology
Russian Federation

German L. Yagovenko, Doctor of Science in Agriculture, Director

The All-Russian Lupin Scientific Research Institute, branch

Bryansk region

Michurinsky



Zh. V. Tsarapneva
Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology
Russian Federation

Zhanna V. Tsarapneva, Senior Researcher

The All-Russian Lupin Scientific Research Institute, branch

Bryansk region

Michurinsky



N. I. Kharaborkina
Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology
Russian Federation

Nina I. Kharaborkina, Researcher

The All-Russian Lupin Scientific Research Institute, branch

Bryansk region

Michurinsky



N. V. Misnikova
Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology
Russian Federation

Nadezhda V. Misnikova, Candidate of Science in Agriculture, Research Secretary

The All-Russian Lupin Scientific Research Institute, branch

2, Berezovaya St.

Bryansk region

Bryansk District

Michurinsky



References

1. Kosolapov V. M., Yagovenko G. L., Lukashevich M. I., Ageeva P. A., Novik N. V., Misnikova N. V., Slesareva T. N., Isaeva E. I., Takunov I. P., Pimohova L. I., Yagovenko T. V. Lupin: breeding, cultivation and use. Bryansk, Bryansk regional polygraphic association, 2020, 304 p. (In Russian).

2. Taylor J. L., De Angelis G., Nelson M. N. How have narrow-leafed lupin genomis resources enhanced our understanding of lupin domestication? In: The Lupin Genome. Compendium of Plant Genomes. Springer Cham., 2020, pp. 95–108. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21270-4_8.

3. Abdulaev R. A., Vishnyakova M. A., Egorova G. P., Radchenko E. E. Phytosanitary monitoring of the narrow-leaved lupine collection of VIR in the northwest of Russia. Trudy po prikladnoj botanike, genetike i selekcii = Proceedings on Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding, 2021, vol. 182, no. 3, pp. 167–173. (In Russian). DOI: 10.30901/2227-8834-2021-3-167-173.

4. Ageeva P. A., Pochutina N. A., Matyuhina M. V. Blue lupine — source of valuable nutrients in forage production. Kormoproizvodstvo = Fodder production, 2020, no. 10, pp. 29–32. (In Russian). https://agro-matik.ru/assets/img/upload/2021/01/22/lupin_uz.pdf?ysclid=l8mxnbmmh5769964290.

5. Kononchuk V. V., Timoshenko S. M., Nazarova T. O., Shtyrhunov V. D., Nikitochkin D. N., Shurkin A. Yu., Kolotilina Z. M. Grain productivity and nitrogen-fixing capacity of narrow-leafed lupine depending on seeding rates, fertilizers and application of herbicides under different weather conditions in the center of the Non-black earth zone of Russia. Zernobobovye i krupyanye kul'tury = Legumes and groat crops, 2021, vol. 2, no. 38, pp. 104–114. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24412/2309-348X-2021-2-104-114.

6. Trivedi Sh., Srivastava M. N., Srivastava A. K., Ratan V., Shahid Mo., Singh An., Pandey S., Dixit S., Srivastava Y. K. Status of Root and Foliar Fungal Diseases of Pulses at Different Agro-Climatic Zones of Uttar Pradesh, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 2017, vol. 6. no. 11, pp. 152–165. DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.020.

7. Ahmad A., Thomas G. J., Barker S. J., MacLeod W. J. Genotype resistance, inoculum source and environment directly influence development of grey leaf spot (caused by Stemphylium spp.) and yield loss in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius). Crop and Pasture Science, 2015, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 81–90. DOI: 10.1071/CP15073.

8. Pimokhova L. I., Yagovenko G. L. Diseases and pests of lupin: system and protection. Bryansk, Chitai-gorod Publ., 2020, 88 p. (In Russian).

9. Andreeva I. V., Ashmarina L. F., Shatalova E. I. Features of changes in the phytosanitary condition of forage crops in Western Siberia. Dostizhenie nauki i tekhniki APK = Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC, 2019, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 26–30. (In Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-izmeneniya-fitosanitarnogo-sostoyaniya-kormovyh-kultur-v-usloviyah-zapadnoy-sibiri?ysclid=l8mxu8h16n220868672.

10. Pimohova L. I., G. L. Yagovenko G. L., Tsarapneva Zh. V., Misnikova N. V. Preыsowing seed treatment of narrow-leafed lupin against anthracnose and other diseases. Sibirskij vestnik sel'skohozyajstvennoj nauki = Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science, 2021, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 22–32. (In Russian). URL: https://sibvest.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/826.

11. Zaprudskij A. A., Yakovenko A. M., Gadzhieva G. I., Belova E. S., Gutkovskaya N. S., Penyaz' E. V. Protection of broad beans and narrow-leafed lupin crops against diseases in vegetation period. Nashe sel'skoe hozyajstvo = Our agriculture, 2020, no. 9, pp. 98–103. (In Russian).

12. Slesareva T. N., Lukashevich M. I. Lupine and some issues of technology for its cultivation. Zashchita i karantin rastenij = Plant Protection and Quarantine, 2018, no. 7, pp. 12–16. (In Russian).

13. Tyuterev S. L. Problems of phytopathogen resistance to new fungicides. Vestnik zashchity rastenij = Plant Protection News, 2001, no. 1, pp. 38–53. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Pimokhova L.I., Yagovenko G.L., Tsarapneva Zh.V., Kharaborkina N.I., Misnikova N.V. Fungicides to protect narrow-leafed lupine against anthracnose and other diseases. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2022;52(4):48-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2022-4-5

Views: 174


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0370-8799 (Print)
ISSN 2658-462X (Online)