Ecological plasticity and stability of spring vetch (tare) under conditions of the West Siberian region
https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2023-2-4
Abstract
The results of evaluating the yield and adaptive properties of the eight varieties and lines of spring vetch (tare Vicia sativa L.) are presented. Kamalinskaya 611 (standard), Novosibirskaya, Baikalskaya × Lgovskaya 34, Baikalskaya × G-252, E-1280, 4604/1-2, GC-964, and Kamalinskaya 611 × Novosibirskaya varieties were included in the study. The productivity of vetch plants in the nursery of preliminary varietal trials is evaluated and the most productive, plastic, stable and adapted samples are identified. The study was conducted in 2017-2019 in the forest-steppe conditions of the Priob'ye region (Novosibirsk region). The most favorable for the formation of green matter yields was 2017, for grain productivity - 2019. The variation in green matter yields ranged from 25.20 (Novosibirskaya in 2018) to 40.70 t/ ha (Kamalinskaya 611 × Novosibirskaya in 2017), and seeds from 1.50 (Kamalinskaya 611 in 2017) to 3.16 t/ha (Kamalinskaya 611 × Novosibirskaya in 2018). Baikalskaya × G-252 and Kamalinskaya 611 × Novosibirskaya samples stood out with the lowest variability and the highest homeostasis in the formation of grain yield, while the lines E-1280 and 4604/1-2 stood out in terms of green matter yield. Baikalskaya × G-252 (by grain yield); Baikalskaya × Lgovskaya 34 (by biomass) and Kamalinskaya 611 × Novosibirskaya (by grain yield and biomass) were selected for breeding value. Among the most responsive to improving conditions and stable are Baikalskaya × Lgovskaya 34 and Kamalinskaya 611 in terms of grain productivity and biomass yield - Kamalinskaya 611 × Novosibirskaya.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. V. GoncharovaRussian Federation
Antonina V. Goncharova, Doctor of Science in Agriculture, Head Researcher
Krasnoobsk, Novosibirsk region
T. N. Kapko
Russian Federation
Tatyana N. Kapko, Researcher
630501, Novosibirsk Region, Krasnoobsk, PO Box 375
References
1. Drannikov A.V., Iskusnykh A.Yu., Derkanosova A.A., Torshina A.A., Kurchaeva E.E., Shevtsov A.A. Use of a complex of biologically active additives in complete compound feed for farm animals. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2022, vol. 1052, pp. 012020. DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/1052/1/012020.
2. Ambarcumova K.A., Toshkina E.A. Аnnual legumes in mixed crops in the conditions of the Novgorod Region. Trudy Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Proceedings of the Kuban State Agrarian University. 2018, vol. 72, pp. 25–27. (In Russian). DOI:10.21515/1999-1703-72-25-27.
3. Maxin G., Andueza D., Le Morvan A., Baumont R. Effect of intercropping vetch (Vicia sativa L.), field pea (Pisum sativum L.) and triticale (× Triticosecale) on dry-matter yield, nutritive and ensiling characteristics when harvested at two growth stages. Grass and Forage Science, 2017, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 777–784. DOI:10.1111/gfs.12277.
4. Rinke N., Kautz T., Aulrich K., Böhma H. The effect of long-and short-stemmed oat in vetchoat intercropping on weed infestation, agronomic performance, and grain quality in low input systems. European Journal of Agronomy. 2022, vol. 140, pp. 126611. DOI:10.1016/j.eja.2022.126611.
5. Telichko O.N., Emelyanov A.N. Productivity of F1 hybrids of Spring Vetch in Primorsky Krai. Kormoproizvodstvo = Fodder Journal, 2020, vol. 5, pp. 35–38. (In Russian).
6. Ignatiev S.A., Regidin А.А. The estimation of adaptability parameters of the collection samples of Sainfoin. Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii = Grain Economy of Russia, 2019, vol. 3 (63) pp. 53–58. (In Russian). DOI:10.31367/2079-8725-2019-63-3-53-58.
7. Sapega V.A., Mitrikovskiy A.Ya. Assessment of yield and adaptive potential of pea varieties in the conditions of the southern forest steppe of the Northern Urals. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University, 2020, vol. 15, no. 2 (58), pp. 49–52. (In Russian). DOI:10.12737/2073-0462-2020-49-52.
8. Parissi Z., Irakli M., Tigka E., Papastylianou P., Dordas C., Tani E., Abraham E.M., Theodoropoulos A., Kargiotidou A., Kougiteas L., Kousta A., Koskosidis A., Kostoula S., Beslemes D., Vlachostergios D.N. Analysis of Genotypic and Environmental Effects on Biomass Yield, Nutritional and Antinutritional Factors in Common Vetch. Agronomy, 2022, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1678. DOI:10.3390/agronomy12071678.
9. Yusova O.A., Nikolaev P.N., Aniskov N.I., Safonova I.V. Ecological response of spring barley varieties to abiotic and biotic factors in the southern forest-steppe of the Omsk region. Tavricheskii vestnik agrarnoi nauki = Taurida Herald of the Agrarian Sciences, 2021, vol. 1 (25), pp. 224–235. (In Russian). DOI:10.33952/2542-0720-2021-1-25-224-235.
10. Ponomareva S.V. The ecological plasticity and stability by yield of seeds and green mass of field pea in the conditions of Volgo-Vyatskiy region. Zernobobovye i krupianye kultury = Legumes and Groat Crops, 2019, vol. 2 (30), pp. 43–48. (In Russian). DOI:10.24411/2309-348X-2019-11086.
11. Zhdanova A.A., Kochneva M.B. An adaptability potential analysis of the Vicia sativa varieties on the green mass yield in the South Eastern zone of the Kamchatka Territory conditions. Vestnik rossiiskoi selskokhoziaistvennoi nauki = Vestnik of the Russian agricultural science, 2021, no. 5, pp. 33–37. (In Russian). DOI:10.30850/vrsn/2021/5/33-373.
Review
For citations:
Goncharova A.V., Kapko T.N. Ecological plasticity and stability of spring vetch (tare) under conditions of the West Siberian region. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2023;53(2):33-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2023-2-4