

On the rational choice of a combine harvester and a reaper for grain harvesting in conditions of Siberia
https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2023-6-9
Abstract
The issue of productivity of modern models of grain harvesters produced by OOO Rostselmash and OAO Gomselmash in connection with the nomenclature of reapers supplied to them for direct harvestering and depending on the grain crop yields typical for the Siberian region was considered. To determine the rational composition of the harvesting unit from the list of models under consideration, the models of combines, the loading of which can be provided in the Siberian region at a level close to or equal to the maximum productivity, were determined by calculation and graphical method. It was found that on condition of using 9,0 m wide reapers with Russian models of combine harvesters and 9,2 m with Byelorussian models, for harvesting works it is rational to use Vector 410 with the yield of 1,8-2,4 t/ha and GS 10 PRO with the yield of 2,45-3,00 t/ha. In this case, their technical potential can be fully realized and the maximum productivity in terms of both harvested area and threshed grain can be ensured. The use of more productive combine harvesters for direct harvesters in Siberia is not always justified, because at the current level of grain yields here their technical potential cannot be fully realized. On the basis of the research, diagrams were obtained, which can be used to select the harvesting machine “combine harvester + reaper”, taking into account the level of yield and the contour of fields in a particular farm, varying the coverage of the reaper.
About the Authors
E. M. MikhaltsovRussian Federation
Candidate of Science in Engineering, Lead Researcher; 26, Korolev ave., Omsk, 644012
M. S. Chekusov
Russian Federation
Candidate of Science in Engineering, Director
A. A. Kem
Russian Federation
Candidate of Science in Engineering, Department Head, Lead Researcher
A. N. Schmidt
Russian Federation
Researcher
R. V. Damansky
Russian Federation
Researcher
References
1. Lomakin S.G., Berdyshev V.E. Formation of combine harvesters fleet with account of harvesting conditions. Vestnik Federal’nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel’nogo uchrezhdeniya vysshego professional’nogo obrazovaniya «Moskovskij gosudarstvennyj agroinzhenernyj universitet imeni V.P. Goryachkina» = Vestnik of the Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education “Moscow State Agroengineering University named after V.P. Goryachkin”, 2016, no. 5 (75), pp. 7–12. (In Russian).
2. Bershitsky Yu.I., Kastidi YU.K., Tyupakov K.E. Characteristics of economic assessment of combine harvesters. Politematicheskij setevoj elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Polythematic online scientific journal of Kuban State Agrarian University, 2015, no. 111, pp. 287–298. (In Russian).
3. Chepurin G.E. Technological certificate for a grain harvester, process chart for a field. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK = Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC, 2017. T. 31, no. 6, pp. 76–79. (In Russian).
4. Pronin V.M., Prokopenko V.A., Dobrynin Yu.M. Criteria for choosing combine harvesters. AgroSnabForum = AgroSnabForum, 2016, no. 5 (144), pp. 20–22. (In Russian).
5. Nemchenko A.V. Modernization as key to competitiveness growth of agricultural production. Mezhdunarodnyj nauchno-issledovatel’skij zhurnal = International Research Journal, 2018, no. 4 (70), pp. 31–33. (In Russian).
6. Chekusov M.S., Mihal’cov E.M., Kem A.A., Shmidt A.N., Damanskij R.V. Tractors and harvesters in agriculture of the Omsk region. Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Vestnik of Omsk SAU, 2021, no. 4 (44), pp. 251–260. (In Russian). DOI: 10.48136/22220364_2021_4_251.
7. Chekusov M.S., Kem A.A., Mikhaltsov E.M., Schmidt A.N. Trends in machinery availability in Agro-Industrial Complex of Omsk region. Sibirskij vestnik sel’skohozyajstvennoj nauki = Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science, 2021, vol. 51, no. 1. рр. 110–117. (In Russian).
8. Mishkhozhev A.A. Criteria for choosing a combine harvester. NovaInfo.Ru. 2016, vol. 2, no. 55, pp. 68–71. (In Russian).
9. Kazakov A.V., Koshelev R.V., Tyul’nev A.V. To the question of the expediency of choosing grain harvesters. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj gosudarstvennoj sel’skohozyajstvennoj akademii = Vestnik of Nizhny Novgorod State Agricultural Academy, 2016, no. 1 (9), pp. 38–41. (In Russian).
10. Ryadnov A.I., Fedorova O.A., Poddubnyj O.I. Improvement of the methodology for choosing grain harvesters. Nauchnyj zhurnal Rossijskogo NII problem melioracii = Scientific Journal of Russian Scientific Research Institute of Land Improvement Problems, 2020, no. 2 (38), pp. 163– 178. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31774/2222-18162020-2-163-178.
11. Is the choice of combine harvester a geographical issue? Tekhnika i oborudovanie dlya sela = Machinery and Equipment for Rural Area, 2017, no. 6, pp. 8–9. (In Russian).
12. Erohin G.N., Konovskij V.V. Impact of the width of the header on the productivity of combine harvester. Nauka v central’noj Rossii = Science in Central Russia, 2020, no. 2 (44), pp. 35–42. (In Russian). DOI: 10.35887/2305-2538-2020-2-35-42.
13. Astaf’ev V.L., Golikov V.A. Determining the range of combine harvesters and headers for Kazakhstan regions. Sel’skohozyajstvennye mashiny i tekhnologii = Agricultural Machinery and Technologies, 2018, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 10–15. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22314/2073-7599-2018-12-4-10-15.
14. Chemodanov S.I., Burlakov Yu.V. Update of the technical equipment of the grain-harvesting complex. Sibirskij vestnik sel’skohozyajstvennoj nauki = Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science, 2021, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 95–101. (In Russian). DOI: 10.26898/0370-8799-2021-6-11.
Review
For citations:
Mikhaltsov E.M., Chekusov M.S., Kem A.A., Schmidt A.N., Damansky R.V. On the rational choice of a combine harvester and a reaper for grain harvesting in conditions of Siberia. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2023;53(6):74-82. https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2023-6-9