Efficiency of pre-sowing treatment of white lupine seeds with complex compositions based on Tebu 60 fungicide

The results of laboratory and field tests of effectiveness of the Tebu 60 protectant, ME (microemulsion) in its pure form and in tank mixtures with Humat+7 and Fitaktiv Vita against anthracnose seed infection and other diseases of lupine are presented. The research was conducted in 2020–2022 in the Bryansk region. The object of the study were the seeds, seedlings and crops of the Michurinsky white lupine variety. In laboratory conditions, biological evaluation of the effectiveness of the Tebu 60 protectant in pure form (rate of consumption – 0.5 l/t) and tank mixtures Tebu 60 + Humate+7 (0.5 + 0.5 l/t) and Tebu 60 + Fitaktiv Vita (0.5 + 0.05 l/t) against anthracnose seed infection was carried out by the number of affected seedlings grown in paper-polyethylene rolls in comparison with the control (without treatment). The tank mixture Tebu 60 + Fitaktiv Vita (100%) showed high biological efficacy against anthracnose. Moreover, this mixture significantly (LSD₀₅ = 0.66) had the least effect on reducing the hypocotyl length of the seedlings (8.8%). The field experiment was laid down in a fourfold repetition. The plot area was 34 m². The seeding rate was 1.0 million germinated seeds/ha. The soil of the site was gray forest soil, humus content – 2.6%. The forecrop was spring cereal crops. Seed dressing with Tebu 60 (0.5 l/t) and tank mixtures Tebu 60 + Humate+7 (0.5 + 0.5 l/t) and Tebu 60 + Fitaktiv Vita (0.5 + 0.05 l/t) were conducted one month before the sowing. The effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated in comparison with the control. On average, the highest biological efficacy against anthracnose seed infection was shown by the tank mixture Tebu 60 + Fitaktiv Vita (98.1%). By the shiny pod phase, the number of affected beans was 20.5% compared to 78.4% in the control. The biological efficacy against fusarium disease and rhizoctonia was 65.9 and 74.4%, respectively. The prevalence of gray rot and white rot on beans was reduced 8 and 11 times, respectively. Seed germination increased significantly (LSD₀₅ = 0.74) by 16.2%, safety of productive plants to harvesting – by 56.5%. Reliable increase in the seed yield was 2.52 t/ha, cost recovery – 64.88 rubles.

1. Kosolapov V.M., Yagovenko G.L., Lukashevich M.I., Ageeva P.A., Novik N.V., Misnikova N.V., Slesareva T.N., Isaeva E.I., Takunov I.P., Pimokhova L.I., Yagovenko T.V. Lupin: breeding, cultivation and use. Bryansk: Bryanskoe oblastnoe poligraficheskoe ob′edinenie Publ., 2020, 304 p. (In Russian).

2. Slesareva T.N., Lukashevich M.I. Lupin and some issues of technology of its cultivation. Zaschita i karantin rasteniy = Plant Protection and Quarantine, 2018, no. 7, pp. 12–16. (In Russian).

3. Toigil'din A.L., Podsevalov M.I., Toigil'dina I.A., Ayupov D.E., Mustafina R.A. Assessment of phytosanitary condition in grain legume crops cultivation in the forest-steppe zone of the Volga region. Niva Povolzh'ya = Volga Region Farmland, 2021, no. 2 (59), pp. 19–27. (In Russian). DOI: 10.36461/NP.2021.59.2.004.

4. Abdullaev R.A., Vishnyakova M.A., Egorova G.P., Radchenko E.E. Phytosanitary monitoring of the narrow-leaved lupine collection of VIR in the northwest of Russia. Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike i selektsii = Proceedings on applied botany, genetics and breeding, 2021, vol. 182, no. 3, pp. 167–173. (In Russian). DOI: 10.30901/2227-8834-2021-3-167-173.

5. Rezvyakova S.V., Arkhangel'skaya A.S. Protection of white lupin from anthracnose. Vestnik agrarnoy nauki = Bulletin of Agrarian Science, 2018, vol. 3, no. 72, pp. 83–86. (In Russian). DOI: 10.15217/48484.

6. Pimokhova L.I., Yagovenko G.L., Tsarapneva Zh.V., Misnikova N.V. A fungicide dresser against fungal phyto-pathogens of narrow-leaf lupin. Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka = Agricultural Science Euro-North-East, 2022, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 714–723. (In Russian). DOI: 10.30766/2072-9081.2022.23.5.714-723.

7. Petricca S., Flati V., Celenza G., Di Gregorio J., Lizzi A.R., Luzi C., Cristiano L., Cinque B., Rossi G., Festuccia C., Lorio R. Tebuconazole and econazole act synergistically in mediating mitochondrial stress, energy imbalance, and sequential activation of autophagy and apoptosis in mouse Sertoli TM4 cells: possible role of AMPK/ULK1 axis. Toxicological Sciences, 2019, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 209–223. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfz031.

8. Arkhangel'skaya A.S., Rezvyakova S.V., Stebakov V.A. The effect of protective measures on the yield of white Dega lupine. Vestnik agrarnoy nauki = Bulletin of Agrarian Science, 2021, vol. 2, no. 89, pp. 16–22. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17238/issn2587-666X.2021.2.16.

9. Cao F., Souders C.L., Li P., Pang S., Qiu L., Martyniuk C.J. Developmental toxicity of the triazole fungicide cyproconazole in embryo-larval stages of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2019, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 4913–4923. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3957-z.

10. Pobezhimova T.P., Korsukova A.V., Dorofeev N.V., Grabel'nykh O.I. Physiological effects of triazole fungicides in plants. Izvestiya vuzov. Prikladnaya khimiya i biotekhnologiya = Proceedings of Universities. Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology, 2019, vol. 9, no. 3 (30), pp. 461–476. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21285/2227-2925-2019-9-3-461-476.

11. Erokhin A.I. Efficacy seedbed preparation of pea seed for sowing using preparation Humate+7. Zernobobovye i krupyanye kul'tury = Legumes and Groat Crops, 2021, vol. 1, no. 37, pp. 14–19. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24412/2309-348Kh-2021-1-14-19.

12. Voronkova N.A., Balabanova N.F., Volkova V.A., Tsyganova N.A., Pakhotina I.V. Application of growth stimulants in the cultivation of spring common wheat. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK = Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC, 2020, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 73–77. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24411/0235-2451-2020-11011.

13. Klochkova O.V., Kholodinskiy V.V. Efficacy of narrow-leafed lupin seeds treatment with protected-and-stimulated solutions with micro-fertilizers. Vestnik Belorusskoy gosudarstvennoy sel'skokhozyaistvennoy akademii = Bulletin of the Belorussian State Agricultural Academy, 2021, no. 1, pp. 121–125. (In Russian).

14. Nazarov R.V., Karimova L.Z., Safin R.I. Effectiveness of pre-sowing treatment of spring barley seeds by the complex compounds based on the Scarlet fungicide. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK = Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC, 2019, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 24–27. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24411/0235-2451-2019-10905.

15. Ahmad L., Zaidi R.K. Effect of chemical and biological treatment for the control seed-borne mycoflora of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Acta Scientific Agriculture, 2018, no. 2, pp. 6–11.