Preview

Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Efficacy of antagonist bacteria of the genera Bacillus and Pseudomonas against barley net blotch pathogen in laboratory conditions

https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2024-12-6

Abstract

Barley net blotch is an economically significant disease of global importance that leads to 10–40% yield loss. The pathogen, Pyrenophora teres, is a pathogen with a high risk of developing multiple resistance to several chemical fungicides at once. Therefore, the development of the methods of biological control of this pathogen is an urgent task. The antagonistic and protective effect of Bacillus velezensis strains BZR 336 g, BZR 517 and Pseudomonas chlororaphis BZR 245 F on two winter barley varieties with different resistance to the net blotch pathogen was investigated. It was found that the strains reduced the growth of P. teres mycelium by an average of 70%, while the pathogen mycelium had various signs of degradation at the microscopic level – deformation, twisting, "vacuolisation". Application of the strains on two varieties of barley for treatment of plants before sowing and during vegetation provided on average suppression of infection penetration into plant tissue by 38.4% and reduction of the development of already penetrated pathogen in plant tissue by 23.2%. When treating only vegetative plants, these values were lower by 3–37%. The susceptible variety Romance showed more effective suppression of infection penetration into plant tissues than suppression of infection spread in already infected plants. The opposite was true on the resistant variety Iosif. The obtained data allow us to conclude that biological methods of controlling barley net blotch have the potential of efficiency and reduce the development of P. teres. The application of biological control of plant diseases will contribute to the production of environmentally safe products in conjunction with the reduction of pesticide pressure on agrocenoses. For a more objective assessment, it is necessary to conduct field studies to evaluate the protective potential of strains on the natural infection background under changing environmental conditions. 

About the Authors

A. M. Asaturova
Federal Research Centre of Biological Plant Protection
Russian Federation

Candidate of Science in Biology, Lead Researcher, Director



N. A. Zhevnova
Federal Research Centre of Biological Plant Protection
Russian Federation

Candidate of Science in Biology, Senior Researcher

p/o 39, Krasnodar, 350039



M. D. Pavlova
Federal Research Centre of Biological Plant Protection
Russian Federation

Marina D. Pavlova, Junior Researcher



O. Yu. Kremneva
Federal Research Centre of Biological Plant Protection
Russian Federation

Candidate of Science in Biology, Lead Researcher



References

1. Mironenko N.V., Lashina N.M., Baranova O.A., Zubkovich A.A., Afanasenko O.S. Hybridization between Pyrenophora teres forms in natural populations of Russia and the Republic of Belarus. Mikologiya i fitopatologiya = Mycology and Phytopathology, 2021, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 51–58. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S0026364821010074.

2. Volkova G., Yakhnik Yа. Pyrenophora teres: population structure, virulence and aggressiveness in Southern Russia. Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2022, vol. 29, no. 10, p. 103401. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103401.

3. Volkova G.V., Danilova A.V., Shulyakovskaya L.N., Minakova A.V. Phytosanitary condition of winter barley crops in the Krasnodar Krai and the Republic of Adygea in the pre-harvest period. Tavricheskiy vestnik agrarnoy nauki = Taurida Herald of the Agrarian Science, 2021, no. 1 (25), pp. 50–63. (In Russian). DOI: 10.33952/2542-0720-2021-1-25-50-63.

4. Backes A., Guerriero G., Ait Barka E., Jacquard C. Pyrenophora teres: taxonomy, morphology, interaction with barley, and mode of control. Frontiers in plant science, 2021, no. 12, р. 614951. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.614951.

5. Hоyer A.K., Jоrgensen H.J.L., Hodkinson T.R., Jensen B. Fungal endophytes isolated from elymus repens, a wild relative of barley, have potential for biological control of Fusarium culmorum and Pyrenophora teres in barley. Pathogens, 2022, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 1097. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11101097.

6. Dahanayaka B.A., Vaghefi N., Knight N.L., Martin A., Bakonyi J., Seress D., Prins R., Snyman L. Population structure of Pyrenophora teres f. teres barley pathogens from different continents. Phytopathology, 2021, vol. 111, no. 11, pp. 2118–2129. DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO09-20-0390-R.

7. Clare S.J., Wyatt N.A., Brueggeman R.S., Friesen T.L. Research advances in the Pyrenophora teres – barley interaction. Molecular plant pathology, 2019, no. 21 (2), pp. 272–288. DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12896.

8. Poudel B., McLean M.S., Platz G.J., Mcilroy J.A., Sutherland M.W., Martin A. Investigating hybridisation between the forms of Pyrenophora teres based on Australian barley field experiments and cultural collections. European journal of plant pathology, 2018, no. 2, pp. 465– 473. DOI: 10.1007/s10658-018-1574-9.

9. Dimkic I., Janakiev Т., Petrovic M., Degrassi G., Fira D. Plant-associated Bacillus and Pseudomonas antimicrobial activities in plant disease suppression via biological control mechanisms: a review. Physiological and molecular plant pathology, 2022, no. 117, p. 101754. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2021.101754.

10. Azizbekyan R.R. Biological preparations for the protection of agricultural plants (review). Applied biochemistry and microbiology, 2019, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 816–823. DOI: 10.1134/S0003683819080027.

11. Maximov I.V., Veselova S.V., Shein M.Yu., Khairullin R.M. Endophytes and plant protection from biotic stress: prospects for the preparation of biocontrol agent new generation. Trudy Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Proceedings of the Kuban State Agrarian University, 2022, no. 98, pp. 98–104. (In Russian).

12. Skiba R.M., Wyatt N.A., Kariyawasam G.K., Fiedler J.D., Yang Sh., Brueggeman R.S., Friesen T.L. Host and pathogen genetics reveal an inverse gene-for-gene association in the P. teres f. maculate – barley pathosystem. Theoretical and applied genetics TAG, 2022, vol. 135, no. 10, pp. 3597–3609. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-022-04204-x.

13. Tomic A., Trkulja V., Matic S., Trkulja N., IlicicR., ScortichiniM., Popovic-MilovanovicT. Net blotch (Pyrenophora teres Drechsler): an increasingly significant threat to barley production. Plant protection science, 2024, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 1–30. DOI: 10.17221/122/2023-pps.

14. Perelló A.E., Couretot L., Curti A., Uranga J.P., Consolo V.F. First report of spot lesion of wheat caused by Pyrenophora teres f. sp. maculata observed in Argentina. Crop protection, 2019, vol. 122, pp. 19–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.03.023.

15. Ronen M., Fridman E., Moreau A., Ben-David R., Harel A., Perl-Treves R., Sela H., Kopahnke D. Characterization of the barley net blotch pathosystem at the center of origin of host and pathogen. Pathogens, 2019, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 275. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens8040275.

16. Asaturova A.M., Zhevnova N.A., Tomashevich N.S. Novel strains-producers of bacterial fungicides for plant protection and the spectrum of their activity. Zashchita i karantin rasteniy = Plant Protection and Quarantine, 2023, no. 10, pp. 10–14. (In Russian). DOI: 10.47528/1026-8634_2023_10_10.


Review

For citations:


Asaturova A.M., Zhevnova N.A., Pavlova M.D., Kremneva O.Yu. Efficacy of antagonist bacteria of the genera Bacillus and Pseudomonas against barley net blotch pathogen in laboratory conditions. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2024;54(12):49-58. https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2024-12-6

Views: 9


ISSN 0370-8799 (Print)
ISSN 2658-462X (Online)