Preview

Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Introduction of an improved management technology into the production process of growing preweaning lambs

https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2025-11-10

Abstract

The production of sheep products with minimal expenditure of material and labor resources is a pressing issue that requires a solution using various technological methods. The objective of the study was to develop an improved technology for keeping lambs during the preweaning period. Lambs were reared from birth to weaning using two technologies: traditional and improved, where a section for 100 ewes (10 sakmans) was equipped next to the winter shelter, separated from the common sheepfold shed by a beam and cellophane film. During lambing, the temperature in the winter shelter was maintained at 15–17 ºС using heaters, while in the equipped section it was 7–9 ºС, and indoors it fluctuated within 4–7 ºС. As a result of equipping an additional section during the transition period from an individual winter shelter to sakman groups, and then after 10–15 days to a common sheepfold shed, it was possible to reduce mortality by almost a half. By weaning, the survival rate of lambs using the improved technology was 91.5%, while using the traditional technology it was 87.2%. The increase in the survival rate of lambs to weaning (almost 5 lambs per 100 ewes) is a promising reserve for lamb production (an average of 45.0–47.5 kg of meat), which, given the current prices for mutton in the Trans-Volga region, means additional revenue of 27–30 thousand rubles. Consequently, improving the conditions for keeping ewes with lambs by equipping an additional section for adaptation to group housing, with a lower than in a winter shelter and higher than in a common sheepfold shed air temperature, as well as reducing drafts, contributes to an increase in the yield of lambs to weaning by 4.9% and an increase in their live weight due to a decrease in stress during the transition period by 5.3%, which ensures additional production and profit.

About the Authors

N. V. Konik
Saratov State University of Genetics, Biotechnology and Engineering named after N.I. Vavilov
Russian Federation

Nina V. Konik, Chair Professor, Doctor of Science in Agriculture, Associate Professor

1, Theater Square, Saratov, 410012



V. V. Sinitsa
Saratov State University of Genetics, Biotechnology and Engineering named after N.I. Vavilov
Russian Federation

Victoria V. Sinitsa, Post-graduate Student

Saratov



M. Kh. Khatkova
Maykop State Technological University
Russian Federation

Maryat Kh. Khatkova, Assistant Professor, Candidate of Science in Agriculture

Maykop



I. A.-A. Bogatyreva
North Caucasian State Academy
Russian Federation

Irina A.-A. Bogatyreva, Department Head, Candidate of Science in Agriculture

Cherkessk



E. A. Kapitonova
Moscow State Academy of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology – MVA named after K.I. Skryabin
Russian Federation

Elena A. Kapitonova, Chair Professor, Doctor of Science in Agriculture, Associate Professor

Moscow



References

1. Yuldashbaev Yu.A., Ibragimov A.G., Romanyuk M.A., Sukharnikova M.A., Chekmareva N.V. Development of sheep breeding in Russia: history, trends and prospects. Zootekhnija = Zootechniya, 2024, no. 6, pp. 27–29. (In Russian). DOI: 10.25708/ZT.2024.37.97.008.

2. Grigoryan L.N., Khmelevskaya G.N., Ravicheva A.V., Stepanova N.G. Modern trends in the development of sheep breeding in Russia. Zootekhnija = Zootechniya, 2024, no. 11, pp. 22–25. (In Russian). DOI: 10.25708/ZT.2024.68.69.005.

3. Gabaev M.S. Economic efficiency of mountain sheep breeding, depending on the live weight of ewes. Zhivotnovodstvo i kormoproizvodstvo = Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production, 2021, Vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 43–53. (In Russian). DOI: 10.33284/2658-3135-104-1-43.

4. Ulimbashev M.B., Ulimbasheva R.A. Formation of meat productivity of Karachaevsky rock breed under conditions of vertical zonality of the North Caucasus territory. Rossiiskaya sel’skokhozyaistvennaya nauka = Russian Agricultural Science, 2020, no. 5, pp. 50–53. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S2500262720050129.

5. Morozov N.M. Innovative techniques and technologies in livestock. Ekonomika sel'skogo hozyajstva Rossii = Agricultural Economy of Russia, 2020, no. 2, pp. 2–8. (In Russian). DOI: 10.32651/202-2.

6. Plotnikova E.V., Artemova E.I. Mutton production increase as a factor to ensure food independence of Russia. Trudy Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Proceedings of the Kuban State Agrarian University, 2023, no. 104, pp. 28–33. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21515/1999-1703-104-28-33.

7. Shauyenov S.K., Yuldashbaev Y.A., Doldasheva G.К., Ibrayev D.К., Mukhametzharova I.Е. Slaughter results and morphological composition of carcasses of lambs of diffe rent origin. Zootekhnija = Zootechniya, 2020, no. 7, pp. 19–22. (In Russian). DOI: 10.25708/ZT.2020.16.71.006.

8. Yudin V.M., Khokhlov V.V. Analysis of the lambs survivability of the Romanov breed under different breeding methods in the Perm region in winter. Vestnik Izhevskoy gosudarstvennoy sel'skokhozyaystvennoy akademii = Bulletin of Izhevsk State Agricultural Academy, 2024, no. 2 (78), pp. 122–127. (In Russian). DOI: 10.48012/1817-5457_2024_2_122-127.

9. Hanoglu O.H., Ozis A.S., Duru S. Effects of non-genetic factors on growth traits and survival rate in Karacabey Merino lambs. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 2023, vol. 26 (3), pp. 473–481. DOI: 10.24425/pjvs.2023.145055.

10. Ceyhan A., Kozaklı Ö. The survival analysis of some environmental factors associated with lamb mortality in Awassi sheep. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2023, vol. 55 (6), p. 409. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-023-03821-y.

11. Flay K.J., Chen A.S., Yang D.A., Kenyon P.R., Ridler A.L. Identification of risk factors for ewe mortality during the pregnancy and lambing period in extensively managed flocks. BMC Vete rinary Research, 2023, vol. 19 (1), p. 257. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-023-03822-x.

12. Wanjala G., Kichamu N., Strausz P., Astuti P.K., Kusza S. On-station comparative analysis of reproductive and survival performance between Red Maasai, Dorper, and Merino sheep breeds. Animal, 2023, vol. 17 (3), p. 100715. DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100715.

13. Capdevila-Ospina K., Corner-Thomas R.A., Flay K.J., Kenyon P.R., Ridler A.L. Factors associated with ewe death and casting in an extensively farmed sheep flock in New Zealand. Ruminants, 2021, no. 1, pp. 87–99. DOI: 10.3390/ruminants1020007.

14. Flay K.J., Ridler A.L., Compton C.W.R., Kenyon P.R. Ewe wastage in New Zealand commercial flocks: extent, timing, association with hogget reproductive outcomes and BCS. Animals, 2021, no. 11, p. 779. DOI: 10.3390/ani11030779.

15. Anwar R., Abebe R., Sheferaw D. Epidemiolo gical study of lamb and kid morbidity and mortality rates and associated risk factors in an extensive management system in the Dalocha district, Silte Zone, Central Ethiopia. Animal Diseases, 2024, vol. 4, р. 46. DOI: 10.1186/s44149-024-00153-8.

16. Gabaev M.S. The criterion of live weight in the early-age use of the Karachai breed ewes in reproduction. Zootekhnija = Zootechniya, 2023, no. 7, pp. 24–28. (In Russian). DOI: 10.25708/ZT.2023.72.12.007.


Review

For citations:


Konik N.V., Sinitsa V.V., Khatkova M.Kh., Bogatyreva I.A., Kapitonova E.A. Introduction of an improved management technology into the production process of growing preweaning lambs. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2025;55(11):97-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2025-11-10

Views: 15


ISSN 0370-8799 (Print)
ISSN 2658-462X (Online)