Classification of crop infestation with field bindweed using ResNet neural network architectures
https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2026-4-2
Abstract
The development of effective methods for automatic weed monitoring is one of the key tasks for improving the sustainability, productivity, and profitability of modern agriculture. The introduction of such technologies underlies the concept of precision farming, which aims at optimizing resources and minimizing anthropogenic impact on agroecosystems. The key role in solving this problem is played by artificial intelligence technologies, in particular Deep Learning methods. The study is devoted to a comparative analysis of the applicability of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with ResNet-18, ResNet-34, and ResNet-50 architectures for solving the problem of classifying crops of five agricultural species (wheat, barley, buckwheat, rapeseed, and flax) based on the sign of infestation with field bindweed. All the tested architectures demonstrated high efficiency, achieving accuracy of more than 91% and an F1-score in the range of 0.85–0.90, which indicates a good balance between the accuracy and completeness of predictions. It was found that the best results were achieved by not the deepest model – ResNet-18, which, despite having lower computational complexity, outperformed the more powerful counterparts ResNet-34 and ResNet-50 in stability and overall prediction accuracy. This fact
About the Authors
V. S. RiksenRussian Federation
Vera S. Riksen, Junior Researcher, Candidate of Science in Agriculture
PO Box 463, Krasnoobsk, Novosibirsk District, Novosibirsk Region, 630501
V. A. Shpak
Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Shpak, Junior Researcher, Candidate of Science in Physics and Mathematics
PO Box 463, Krasnoobsk, Novosibirsk District, Novosibirsk Region, 630501
A. A. Pobelenskaya
Russian Federation
Anastasia A. Pobelenskaya, Junior Researcher
PO Box 463, Krasnoobsk, Novosibirsk District, Novosibirsk Region, 630501
References
1. Osovin M.N. Analysis of current trends in the implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in agriculture. Ostrovskie Chteniya = Ostrovsky readings, 2024, no. 1, pp. 136–144. (In Russian).
2. Saifetdinov A.R., Maksimenko A.A. Applying machine learning and AI to analyze agricultural data and increase yield. Kontentus= Contentus, 2023, vol. 8, no. 7S, pp. 28–34. (In Russian).
3. Raevskaya E.G. Introducing artificial intelligence in Chinese agriculture (review). Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka = Agricultural Science Euro-North-East, 2024, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 739–753. (In Russian). DOI: 10.30766/2072-9081.2024.25.5.739-7534.
4. Zabalueva D.V., Satarinа Z.E., Eroshenkо L.M., Semenova E.Yu. Impact of climatic factors on the yielding capacity of spring barley in the conditions of Vladimir oblast. Vladimirskiy Zemledelets = Vladimir agricolist, 2024, no. 1, pp. 56–61. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24412/2225-2584-2024-1107-56-61.
5. Mitrofanov D.V. Effect of weather conditions, productive moisture, soil macronutrients and weeds on pea yield. Izvestiya Timiryazevskoj sel'skokhozyajstvennoj akademii = Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 2025, no. 1, pp. 22–42. (In Russian).
6. Gushchina V.A., Lykova A.S., Korolev A.S. Infestation of white mustard agrocenosis, depending on agricultural practices in the conditions of the forest-steppe of the Middle Volga region. Agrarnyy Nauchnyy Zhurnal = Agrarian Scientific Journal, 2023, no. 6, pp. 12–17. (In Russian).
7. Khryashchev V.V., Klyuchnikov A.S., Kotov N.V., Larionov R.V. Identification of main types of feed crops and weeds on images from the fields by artificial intelligence techniques. Vestnik APK Verkhnevolzhya = Herald of Agroindustrial complex of Upper Volga region, 2023, vol. 3, p. 63. (In Russian). DOI: 10.35694/YARCX.2023.63.3.013.
8. Fedosov A.Yu., Menshikh A.M., Fartukov V.A., Zborovskaya M.I., Vasiliev D.M. The use of artificial intellect in the optimization of irrigation and the use of herbicides. Ekonomika stroitelstva = Economics of construction, 2023, no. 2, pp. 42–51. (In Russian).
9. Pugachev N.A., Gamburtsev S.D., Fomin A.A., Syamina E.I. Prospects for the use of artificial intelligence technologies in agriculture. Moskovskiy Ekonomicheskiy Zhurnal = Moscow Economic Journal, 2024, no. 1, pp. 377–382. (In Russian). DOI: 10.55186/2413046X_2023_9_1_64.
10. Naheed R., Momin A. Smart farming technologies: AI-driven crop monitoring and precision agronomy. Innovative Research in Applied, Biological and Chemical Sciences, 2025, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 6–14.
11. Urbina J.C.C. The impact of artificial intelligence on agronomy students. Sinergia Académica, 2025, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 447–457.
12. Haq S.I.U., Tahir M.N., Lan Y. Weed detection in wheat crops using image analysis and artificial intelligence (AI). Applied Sciences, 2023, vol. 13, no. 15, p. 8840.
13. Venkateswara S.M., Padmanabhan, J. Deep learning based agricultural pest monitoring and classification. Scientific Reports, 2025, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 8684.
14. Upadhyay N., Sharma D.K., Bhargava A. 3swnet: A feature fusion network for semantic weed detection in precision agriculture. Food Analytical Methods, 2025, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 2241–2257.
15. Xiao F., Wang H., Li Ya., Ying C. Object detection and recognition techniques based on digital image processing and traditional machine learning for fruit and vegetable harvesting robots: An overview and review. Agronomy, 2023, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 639. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13030639.
16. Gao X., Gao J., Qureshi W.A. Applications, trends, and challenges of precision weed control technologies based on deep learning and machine vision. Agronomy, 2025, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 1954. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy15081954.
17. Muchhadiya R.M., Kumawat P.D., Gohil B., Sakarvadia H. Precision weed management using artificial intelligence tools and techniques for sustainable agriculture. Agriculture & Food e-Newsletter, 2024, vol. 6, no. 1.
18. Wu W. Research into the application of ResNet in soil: A review. Agriculture, 2025, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 661.
19. Ajayi O.G., Olufade O.O. Drone-based crop type identification with convolutional neural networks: An evaluation of the performance of ResNet architectures. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2023, vol. 10, pp. 991–998.
20. Howard D., Gugger S. Deep Learning with fastai and PyTorch: Minimal Formulas, Minimal Code, Maximum Efficiency. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2022, 624 p. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Riksen V.S., Shpak V.A., Pobelenskaya A.A. Classification of crop infestation with field bindweed using ResNet neural network architectures. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2026;56(4):15-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2026-4-2
JATS XML







