Preview

Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science

Advanced search

PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS OF SEA-BUCKTHORN PROTECTION AGAINST MAJOR PESTS

Abstract

Methods are suggested to reduce pesticide load in commercial sea-buckthorn plantations due to the application of biologically active supplement based on organic acids, preparation Aphidin on the base of natural BAS and biological preparation Phytoverm. The biological active supplement allows 2-2.5 times decreasing consumption rates of Phytoverm and Actellic with the same effectiveness of treatment against major sea-buckthorn pests. Moreover, it intensifies the growth and development of plants, increases their productivity, improves the biochemical composition of fruits as to such basic indices as carotenoids and oil contents, 2.2-4 times reduces the content of toxic residue in fruits and provides obtaining ecologically pure products under certain conditions. Both full and reduced Actellic dosages showed the highest insecticidal effect against larvae of sea-buckthorn fly, cotton-stem moth and sea-buckthorn psylla with pest death level of 95.8-100 percent. Equally, Phytoverm showed the high miticidal activity against leaf and gall mites ensuring pest death level of 98.9-100 percent. The preparation Aphidin on the base of natural BAS can be used for protection of sea-buckthorn plantations against green sea-buckthorn aphid.

About the Author

L. D. Shamanskaya
The Lisavenko Research Institute of Horticulture for Siberia, Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Russian Federation


References

1. Shalkevich M. Seabuckthorn Cultivars Resistance to Rhagoletis batava var. obscuriosa Kol. In Belarus. The 2nd european workshop on seabuckthorn. Program, EuroWorks 2012 Integrated forestry development project. Integrated Pest management plan. - 2012. - 18 p.

2. Шаманская Л.Д. Биологический способ защиты облепихи от облепиховой мухи (Rhagoletis batava obscuriosa Kol.) // Достижения науки и техники АПК. - 2010. - № 6.- С. 48-50.

3. Гар К.А. Методы испытания токсичности и эффективности пестицидов. - М., 1963. - 286 с.

4. Шаманская Л.Д. Афицидная активность органических кислот // Сиб. вестн. с.-х. науки. - 2009. - № 9. - С. 34-40.

5. Бабенко О.Н., Сафронова Н.М. Влияние регуляторов роста на проростки яровой пшеницы в условиях водного стресса // Вестн. науки Казахского государственного аграрного технического университета им. С. Сейфулина. - 2005. - Т. 4, № 7. - С. 19-24.

6. Воропай Н.Г. Продуктивность растений репчатого лука в зависимости от способов предпосевной обработки семян // Труды Кубанского СХИ. - 1989. - Т. 282. - С. 42-45.

7. Клочкова Н.М., Аханов Э.К., Третьяков Н.И. СО2 - газообмен растений гороха посевного различных морфотипов под действием янтарной кислоты и эпика // С.-х. биология. - 2004. - № 1. - С. 67-62.

8. Наумова Л.В. Вредители облепихи в Московской области // Актуальные проблемы размножения садовых культур и пути их решения. - Мичуринск, 2010. - С. 173-177.


Review

For citations:


Shamanskaya L.D. PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS OF SEA-BUCKTHORN PROTECTION AGAINST MAJOR PESTS. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2014;(1):44-50. (In Russ.)

Views: 216


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0370-8799 (Print)
ISSN 2658-462X (Online)