THE PROBLEM OF COMBINED STRESS RESISTANCE OF PLANTS UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE IN SIBERIA
https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2018-2-11
Abstract
The problem of combined stress resistance of plants due to climate change in Siberia is analyzed on the basis of the literature data. According to the research of the Russian Federal Service for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring and as a result of climate monitoring of the World Meteorological Organization, it is clearly concluded that regional climate changes in Russia are more signifi cant than in other regions of the world and have a pronounced character. The effects of the climate change have the most signifi cant impact on agriculture, which, to a large extent, depends on weather and climate conditions. In crop breeding, adaptation measures include increasing of the stress resistance of plants by changing the species composition of cultivated plants, introducing new varieties, developing new technologies and protection methods and other measures. It is shown that due to the climate change, there is a need to develop regional landscape complex programs, and to model joint action of stressors in laboratory conditions taking into account the increase of the stress tolerance in fi eld conditions. The most intensive combinations of stressors by their damaging action on crop productivity are considered. Different combinations of stressors require new types of plant responses, which are formed at the molecular, cellular and organismic levels. The attention is focused on the need for the application of innovative approaches that take into account information about the microbial community of a habitat (metagenomic technologies) and the use of modern molecular biological methods based on the transcriptomic, metabolomic and proteomic analysis of plants.
About the Authors
T. A. Gurova
Siberian Federal Scientifi c Center of Agro-BioTechnologies RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Science in Agriculture, Head of Laboratory.
Krasnoobsk, Novosibirsk region, 630501
G. M. Osipova
Siberian Federal Scientifi c Center of Agro-BioTechnologies RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Head Researcher.
Krasnoobsk, Novosibirsk region, 630501
References
1. World Meteorological Organization. – WMO, 2017. – № 1189 [Elektronnyi resurs]: http:// www.wmo.int/pages/themes/WMO climatechange en.html
2. Doklad ob osobennostyakh klimata na territorii Rossiiskoi Federatsii za 2016 god. – M.: Rosgidromet, 2017. – 70 s.
3. Strategicheskii prognoz izmenenii klimata Rossiiskoi Federatsii na period do 2010-2015 gg. i ikh vliyaniya na otrasli ekonomiki Rossii. – M.: Rosgidromet, 2005. – 28 s.
4. Paramonov V.V., Zemtsev V.A., Kopysov S. G. Klimat Zapadnoi Sibiri v fazu zamedleniya potepleniya (1986–2015 gg.) i prognozirovanie gidroklimaticheskikh resursov na 2021–2030 gg. // Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Inzhiniring resursov. – 2017. – T. 328, № 1. – S. 62–74.
5. Priruchit’ pogodu. Global’noe poteplenie nanosit uron agrariyam // Agrotekhnika i tekhnologiya. – 2017. – № 5. – [Elektronnyi resurs]: http://www.agroinvestor.ru/regions/article/28577-nebesnye-syurprizy/
6. Kokorin A.O. Izmenenie klimata: obzor Pyatogo otsenochnogo doklada MGEIK. – M.: Vsemirnyi fond dikoi prirody (WWF), 2014. – 80 s.
7. Izmenenie klimata Sibiri. – [Elektronnyi resurs]: http://3rm.info/interesnoe/58094-izmenenie-klimata-sibiri.html
8. Gans Sel’e. Ocherki ob adaptatsionnom sindrome. – M.: MEDGIZ, 1960. – 253 s.
9. Sel’e G. Na urovne tselogo organizma. – M.: Nauka, 1972. – 122 s.
10. Veselova T.V., Veselovskii V.A., Chernavskii D.S. Stress u rastenii (biofi zicheskii podkhod). – M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1993. – 144 s.
11. Pyatygin S.S. Stress u rastenii: fi ziologicheskii podkhod // Zhurn. Obshchei Biologii. – 2008. – T. 69, № 4. – S. 294–298.
12. Rastenie i stress (kurs lektsii). – GOU VPO «Ural’skii GU». – Ekaterinburg, 2008. – 40 s.
13. Genkel’ P.A. O sopryazhennoi i konvergentnoi ustoichivosti rastenii // Fiziologiya rastenii. – 1979. – T. 26, vyp. 5. – S. 921–929.
14. Suzuki N., Rivero R.M., Shulaev V., Blumwald E., Mittler R. Abiotic and biotic stress combinations // New Phytologist. – 2014. – Vol. 203, N 1. – P. 32–43.
15. Kuznetsov Vl.V., Rakitin V.Yu., Borisova N. N., Rotscchupkin B.V. Why does heat shock increase salt resistance in cccotton plants? // Plant Physiol. Biochem. – 1993. – Vol. 31, N 2. – P. 181–188.
16. Kuznetsov Vl.V., Rakitin V.Yu., Zholkevich V.N. Effects of preliminary heatshock treatment on accumulation of osmolytes and drought resistance in cotton plants during water defi ciency // Physiologia Plantarum. – 1999. – Vol. 107, N 4. – P. 399–406.
17. Toaima V.I., Radyukina N.L., Dmitrieva G. A., Kuznetsov Vl.V. Uchastie antioksidantnoi zashchitnoi sistemy bazilika v kross - adaptatsii pri kompleksnom deistvii UF – V i zasoleniya. // Vestnik RUDN, seriya Agronomiya i zhivotnovodstvo. – 2010. – № 3. – S. 34–40.
18. Norkulov N.Kh., Davlyatnazarova Z.B., Shukurova M.Kh., Ashurov S.Kh., Faizieva S.A., Aliev K.A. Vliyanie teplovogo shoka i posleduyushchei pochvennoi zasukhi na aktivnost’ okislitel’nykh sistem rastenii kartofelya // Izvestiya akademii nauk respubliki Tadzhikistan, otdelenie biologicheskikh i meditsinskikh nauk. – 2014. – № 4 (188). – S. 29–35.
19. Yongbo Wu, Bo Ye. Effects of combined elevated temperature and drought stress on anti-oxidative enzyme activities and reactive oxygen species metabolism of Broussonetia papyrifera seedlings // Shengtai xuebao. – 2016. – Vol. 36, N 2. – P. 403–410.
20. Ptazek A., Hura K., Zur I., Nimczyk E. Relationship between frost tolerance and coldinduced resistance of spring barley, meadow fescue and winter oilseed rape to fungal pathogens // J. Agron and Grop Sci. – 2003. – Vol. 189, N 5. – P. 333–340.
21. Chang Hong-jun, Qin Yu-qian. Vliyanie stressov NaCl i zasukhi na kachestvo i fl uorestsentsiyu khlorofi lla myatlika lugovogo // Acta Bot.boreali-occidenl. Sin. – 2008. – T. 28, № 9. – S. 1850–1855.
22. Kissoudis C., Chowdhury R., Van Heusden S., Van de Wiel C., Finkers R., Visser R. G., Bai Y., Van der Linden G. Combined biotic and abiotic stress resistance in tomato // Euphytica. – 2015. – Vol. 202, N 2. – P. 317– 332. DOI 10.1007/s10681–015–1363–x
23. Gurova T.A., Lugovskaya O.S., Svezhintseva E.A. Vliyanie sovmestnogo deistviya obyknovennoi kornevoi gnili i khloridnogo zasoleniya na prorostki sortov pshenitsy // Uspekhi sovremennoi nauki. – 2017. – T. 2, № 4. – S. 157–159.
24. Kuznetsov V.V. Indutsibel’nye sistemy i ikh rol’ v adaptatsii rastenii k stressornym faktoram: avtoref. dis…. d-ra biol. nauk v forme nauchnogo doklada. – Kishinev. – 1992. – 74 s.
25. Karpun N.N., Yanushevskaya E.B., Mikhailova E.V. Mekhanizmy formirovaniya nespetsifi cheskogo indutsirovannogo immuniteta u rastenii pri biogennom stresse. // Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya. – 2015. – T. 50, № 5. – S. 540–549.
26. Kuznetsov V.V. Obshchie sistemy ustoichivosti i transduktsiya stressornogo signala pri adaptatsii rastenii k abioticheskim faktoram // Vestn. Nizhegorodskogo un-ta. – 2001. – T. 48, № 5 – S. 65–69.
27. Medvedev S.S. Fiziologiya rastenii: Uchebnik. – SPb: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2004. – 336 s.
28. Kreslavski V.D., Allakhverdiev S.I., Los D.A., Kuznetsov V.V. Signaling role of reactive oxygen species in plants under stress Signaling role of reactive oxygen species in plants under stress // Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. – 2012. – T. 59, № 2. – S. 141–154.
29. Kashevarov N.I., Osipova G.M., Tyuryukov A.G., and Filippova N.I. Investigation of the characteristics of smooth bromegrass (Bromopsis inermis Leys) biological traits for cultivation under extreme environmental conditions // Russian Agricultural Sciences. – 2015. – Vol. 41, № 1. – P. 14–17.
30. Mittler R., Blumwald E. Genetic engineering for modern agriculture: challenges and perspectives // The annual Review of Plant Biology. – 2010. – Vol. 61. – P. 443–462.
31. Metodicheskie polozheniya rannei diagnostiki ustoichivosti sortov yarovoi pshenitsy i yachmenya k sovokupnomu deistviyu stressorov / T.A. Gurova, S.G. Denisyuk, O.S. Lugovskaya, E.A. Svezhintseva, V.V. Mineev; SFNTsA RAN.– Novosibirsk: SFNTsA RAN, 2017. – 62 s.
32. Gurova T.A., Osipova G.M. Instrumental’nye metody i programmno-apparatnye sredstva pri reshenii problemy stressoustoichivosti v rastenievodstve // Vychislitel’nye tekhnologii. – 2016. – T. 21, vyp. 1. – S. 65–74.
33. Mittler R. Abiotic stress, the fi eld environment and stress combination // Trends in Plant Science. – 2006. – Vol. 11. – P. 15–19.
34. Bandurska H., Niedziela J., Chadzinikolau T. Separate and combined responses to water defi cit and UV-B radiation // Plant Science. – 2013. – Vol. 213. – P. 98–105.
35. Cherif J., Mediouni C., Ben Ammar W., Jemal F. Interactions of zinc and cadmium toxicity in their effects on growth and in antioxidative systems in tomato plants (Solanum lycoopersicum) // J. of Environmental Sciences (China). – 2011. – Vol. 23. – P. 837–844.
36. De Silva ND., Cholewa E., Ryser P. Effects of combined drought and heavy metal stresses on xylem structure and hydraulic conductivity in red maple (Acer rubrum L.) // J. of Experimental Botany. – 2012. – Vol. 63. – P. 5957–5966.
37. Ahmed IM., Dai H., Zheng W., Gao F., Zhang G., Sun D., Wu F. Genotypic differences in physiological characteristics in the tolerance to drought and salinity combined stress between Tibetan wild and cultivated barley // Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. – 2013. – Vol. 63. – P. 49–60.
38. Atkinson NJ, Urwin PE. The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the fi eld // J. of Experimental Botany. – 2012. – Vol. 63. – P. 3523–3543.
39. Carter AH, Chen XM, Garland-Campbell K, Kidwell KK. Identifying QTL or hightemperature adult-plant resistance to stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici ) in the spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar ‘Louise’. TAG. // Theoretical and Applied Genetics. – 2009. – Vol. 119. – P. 1119–1128.
40. Bowler C, Fluhr R. The role of calcium and activated oxygens as signals for controlling cross-tolerance // Trends in Plant Science. – 2000. – Vol. 5. – P. 241–246.
41. Rouhier N, Jacquot JP. Getting sick may help plants overcome abiotic stress // New Phytologist . – 2008. – Vol.180. – P. 738–741.
42. Pshibytko N.L., Zenevich L.A., Zhavoronkova N.B., Lysenko E.A., Kabashnikova L. F. Zasukha kak kostressor pri fuzarioznom uvyadanii tomatov (Solanum Lycopersicum) // Vestnik natsional’noi akademii nauk Belarusi. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 80–84.
43. Yushkevich T.I. Kross-adaptatsiya i ustoichivost’ prorostkov sakharnoi svekly pri deistvii sverkh sil’nykh stressorov // Sovremennaya mikologiya v Rossii. – 2015.– T. 5. – S. 160.
44. Anderson JP, Badruzsaufari E, Schenk PM, Manners JM, Desmond OJ, Ehlert C, Maclean DJ, Ebert PR, Kazan K. Antagonistic interaction between abscisic acid and jasmonate-ethylene signaling pathways modulates defense gene expression and disease resistance in Arabidopsis // Plant Cell. – 2004. – Vol. 16. – P. 3460–3479.
45. Amtmann A, Trouffl ard S, Armengaud P. The effect of potassium nutrition on pest and disease resistance in plants // Physiologia Plantarum. – 2008. – Vol. 133. – P. 682–691.
46. Zhu Y, Qian W, Hua J. Temperature modulates plant defense responses through NB-LRR proteins // PLoS Pathogens. – 2010. – Vol. 6. e100084.
47. Atkinson NJ, Lilley CJ, Urwin PE. Identifi cation of genes involved in the response of Arabidopsis to simultaneous biotic and abiotic stresses // Plant Physiology. – 2013. – Vol. 162. – P. 2028–2041.
48. Schenke D, Bottcher C, Scheel D. Crosstalk between abiotic ultraviolet-B stress and biotic (fl g22) stress signaling in Arabidopsis prevents fl avonol accumulation in favor of pathogen defence compound production // Plant, Cell & Environment. – 2011. – Vol. 34. – P. 1849– 1864.
49. Prasad P.V., Pisipati S.R., Momčilović I, Ristic Z. Independent and combined effects of high temperature and drought stress during grain fi lling on plant yield and chloroplast EF-Tu expression in spring wheat // Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. – 2011. – Vol. 197. – P. 430–441.
50. Demirevska K, Simova-Stoilova L, Fedina I, Georgieva K, Kunert K. Response of oryzacystatin I transformed tobacco plants to drought, heat and light stress // Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. – 2010. – Vol. 196. – P. 90–99.
51. Perez-Lopez U, Miranda-Apodaca J, Munoz-Rueda A, Mena-Petite A. Lettuce production and antioxidant capacity are differentially modifi ed by salt stress and light intensity under ambient and elevated CO2 // Journal of Plant Physiology. – 2013. – Vol. 170. – P. 1517–1525.
52. Sales C.R., Ribeiro R.V., Silveira J.A., Machado E.C., Martins M.O., Lagoa A.M. Superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase improve the recovery of photosynthesis in sugarcane plants subjected to water defi cit and low substrate temperature // Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. – 2013. – Vol. 73. – P. 326–336.
53. Arbona V., Manzi M., Ollas C., Gumez-Cadenas A. Metabolomics as a tool to investigate abiotic stress tolerance in plants // International Journal of Molecular Sciences – 2013. – 14(3): 4885-4911 DOI: 10.3390/ijms14034885
54. Bo Peng, Hui Li, Xuan-Xian Eng. Functional metabolomics: from biomarker discovery to metabolome reprogramming // Protein & Cell. – 2015. – Vol. 6, N 9. – P. 628–637, DOI. ORG/10.1007/s13238-015-0185-x
55. Drapal M., Vignolo E.R.F., Rosales R.O.G., Bonierbale M., Mihovilovich E., Fraser P. D. Identifi cation of metabolites associated with water stress responses in Solanum tuberosum L. clones. // Phytochemistry. – 2017. – Vol. 135. – P. 24–33 DOI 10.1016/j.phytochem.2016.12.003
56. Puzanskii R.K., Emel’yanov V.V., Gavrilenko T.A., Shishova M.F. Metabolomika — sovremennyi podkhod pri izuchenii adaptatsii rastenii kartofelya k bioticheskomu i abioticheskomu stressu (obzor) //Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya. – 2018. – T. 53, № 1. – S. 15–28 DOI: 10.15389/agrobiology.2018.1.15rus
57. Sun CX, Li MQ, Gao XX, Liu LN, Wu XF, Zhou JH. Metabolic response of maize plants to multi-factorial abiotic stresses // Plant Biol (Stuttg). – 2016 Jan.; – Vol. 18. – Suppl 1. – P. 120–129. DOI: 10.1111/plb.12305. Epub 2015 Jan 26
58. Koussevitzky S., Suzuki N., Huntington S., Armijo L., Sha W., Cortes D., Shulaev V., Mittler R. Ascorbate peroxidase 1 plays a key role in the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to stress combination // Journal of Biological Chemistry. – 2008. – Vol. 283. – P. 34197– 34203.
59. Prasch CM, Sonnewald U. Simultaneous application of heat, drought, and virus to Arabidopsis plants reveals signifi cant shifts in signaling networks // Plant Physiology. – 2013. – Vol. 162. – P. 1849–1866.
60. Rasmussen S., Barah P., Suarez-Rodriguez MC, Bressendorff S., Friis P., Costantino P., Bones AM, Nielsen HB, Mundy J. Transcriptome responses to combinations of stresses in Arabidopsis // Plant Physiology. – 2013. – Vol. 161. – P. 1783–1794.
61. Tikhonovich I.A., Ivanova E.A., Pershina E. V., Andronov E.E. Meta genomnye tekhnologii vyyavleniya geneticheskikh resursov mikroorganizmov // Vestn. RAN. – 2017. – № 4. – S. 31–35.
62. Chebotar’ V.K., Shcherbakov A.V., Shcherbakova E.N., Maslennikova S. N., Zaplatkin A.N., Mal’fanova N.V. Endofi tnye bakterii kak perspektivnyi biotekhnologicheskii resurs i ikh raznoobrazie // Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya. – 2015. – T. 50, № 5. – S. 648–654.
63. Baltruschaft H., Fodor J., Harrach B.D. et al. Salt tolerance of barley induced by the root endophyte Piriformospora indica is associated with a strong increase in antioxidants // New Phytologist. – 2008. – Vol. 180, N 2. – P. 501– 510.
64. Penuelas J., SardansJ., Estiarte M., Ogaya R., Carnicer J. and et al. Evidance of current impact of climate change on life: a walk from genes to the biosphere // Clobal Change Biology. – 2013. – Vol. 19, N 8. – P. 2303– 2338.
Review
For citations:
Gurova T.A., Osipova G.M. THE PROBLEM OF COMBINED STRESS RESISTANCE OF PLANTS UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE IN SIBERIA. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2018;48(2):81-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2018-2-11
Views:
494
Email this article 