Pre-emergence and postemergence application of herbicide Adengo in corn crops
https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2019-1-2
Abstract
The trials of herbicide Adengo were conducted under vegetation (2016, 2017) and field conditions (2016-2018) in corn crops of the hybrid population P 8521 for grain. The experimental plot had brown meadow podzolized soil, containing 3.5% percent of humus in the arable horizon. Agricultural technology used was based on non-moldboard soil tillage system. The predecessor was soya. Susceptibility to Adengo herbicide was studied in 15 weed species with pre-emergence application and 13 species with the treatment of vegetative plants. The research identified weeds that were highly susceptible to Adengo herbicide under vegetation conditions (biological efficiency of the preparation over 90%): barnyard grass, yellow-foxtail grass, velvet leaf, lamb’s quarters, common amaranth, St. Paul's wort, smartweed, hibiscus trostisy, field sow thistle and bristle thistle; moderately susceptible (70-90%): bristle grass, hairy cup grass, common ragweed and Asian copperleaf; and weakly susceptible (less than 70%): dayflower. In post-emergence application of Adengo, dayflower proved to be a susceptible weed, while Asian copperleaf - weakly susceptible. Weed infestation of experimental plots in the field experiment amounted to 542 pieces of weeds per m2 on average, with the total above-ground mass of 4427 g/m2. Herbicide Adengo (0.4 and 0.5 l/ha) applied before the crop and weeds emerged, and in phases 2-3 and 5-6 of corn leaves reduced the number of weeds to 134-199 pieces/m2 (or by 63-75%). In all periods of application, the herbicide was actively restraining the growth and development of annual grasses by 77-91%, and annual dicotyledons - by 95-99%. Dayflower was effectively eliminated when using Adengo in the phase of 2-3 leaves (86%), and bristle thistle - when spraying in the phase of 5-6 leaves (81-88%). High biological efficiency of the post-emergence herbicide application made it possible to save 4.75-5.26 t/ha of corn grain, while the yield in the control was 0.72 t/ha. Pre-emergence application of the herbicide resulted in a lower yield of corn grain by 0.49-1.0 t/ha than post-emergence application.
About the Authors
A. V. KostyukRussian Federation
Candidate of Science in Agriculture, Lead Researcher.
42a, Mira st, Kamen-Rybolov, Khankaiskiy District, Primorsky Territory, 692684
N. G. Lukacheva
Russian Federation
Candidate of Science in Agriculture, Senior Researcher.
Kamen-Rybolov, Primorsky Territory
References
1. Sotchenko V.S., Gorbacheva A.G., Orlyan-skii N.A., Orlyanskaya N.A., Vetoshkina I.A., Panfilova O.N., Krivosheev G.Ya. Optimizatsiya semenovodstva gibridnoi kukuruzy i ispol’zovanie selektsionnykh indeksov [Optimization of hybrid corn seed production and the use of breeding indices]. Kukuruza i sorgo [Corn and sorghum], 2017, no. 3, рр. 3-9. (In Russian).
2. Altukhova T.V., Kostyuk A.V. Bor’ba s prosom kurinym v posevakh kukuruzy [Fight against barnyard grass in corn crops]. Zemledelie [Zemledelie], 2005, no. 6, рр. 32-33. (In Russian).
3. Altukhova T.V., Kostyuk A.V., Spiridonov Yu.A., Shestakov V.G., Ginevskii N.K. Kak zashchitit’ kukuruzu ot ambrozii polynno-listnoi [How to protect corn from ragweed ambrosia]. Zashchita i karantin rastenii. [Board of Plant Protection and Quarantine], 2005, по. 7, рр. 38-39. (In Russian).
4. Panfilov A.E., Korystina D.S., Korystin E.S., Tsymbalenko I.N. Vredonosnost’ sornyakov razlichnykh biologicheskikh grupp v posevakh kukuruzy [Harmfulness of weeds of various biological groups in corn crops]. Kukuruza i sorgo [Corn and sorghum], 2007, по. 6, рр. 16-19. (In Russian).
5. Korneeva O.G., Bairambekov Sh.B., Dauletov B.S. Gerbitsidy dlya zashchity posevov kukuruzy ot sornoi rastitel’nosti v del’te Volgi [Herbicides to protect corn crops from weeds in the Volga Delta]. Zashchita i karantin rastenii [Board of Plant Protection and Quarantine], 2014, no. 4, рр. 17-24. (In Russian).
6. Ladonin V.F., Shevchenko M.S., Pashchenko Yu.M., Khmara V.V., Litvinenko Yu.V., Kramarev S.M. Biologicheskaya konkurentsiya kukuruzy s sornyakami [Biological competition of corn with weeds]. Zemledelie [Zemledelie], 1999, no. 4, р. 27. (In Russian).
7. Ivashchenko A.A., Ivashchenko A.A. Vybor sroka khimpropolki kukuruzy - otvetstven-noe reshenie [Choosing the term of the corn weed shelf - a responsible decision]. Zashchita i karantin rastenii [Board of Plant Protection and Quarantine], 2013, no. 3, рр. 34-36. (In Russian).
8. Bagrintseva V.N. Merlin zashchitit kukuruzu [Merlin protects the corn]. Kukuruza i sorgo [Corn and sorghum], 2009, no. 3, рр. 23-24. (In Russian).
9. Grin’ko A.V. Effektivnost’ gerbitsidov pri kompleksnom zasorenii kukuruzy [The effect of herbicides application to control complex weed infestation of maize crops]. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Izvestiya Orenburg State Agrarian University], 2014, no. 4, pp. 53-57. (In Russian).
10. Silaev A.I. Stanchenkov B.G. Merlin - samyi vysokoeffektivnyi gerbitsid na posevakh kuku-ruzy [Merlin - the most highly effective herbicide on maize crops]. Zemledelie [Zemledelie], 2000, no. 1, pр. 31. (In Russian).
11. Marushko N.I., Luchinskii S.I. Effektivnost’ gerbitsida Merlin na posevakh kukuruzy [The effectiveness of the herbicide Merlin on corn]. Agro XXI [Agro XXI], 2001, no. 3, рp. 13. (In Russian).
12. Spiridonov Yu.Ya., Larina G.E., Shestakov V.G. Metodicheskoe rukovodstvo po izucheniyu gerbitsidov, primenyaemykh v rastenievodstve [Methodical guide to the study of herbicides used in crop production]. Moscow, Pechatnyi Gorod Publ., 2009, 252 p. (In Russian).
13. Dospekhov B.A. Metodika polevogo opyta. [Technique of field experiments]. Moscow, Kolos Publ., 1979. 416 p. (In Russian).
14. Koronevskii V.A. K metodike statisticheskoi obrabotki dannykh mnogo-letnikh polevykh opytov [To the method of statistical data processing of longterm field experiments]. Zem-ledelie [Agriculture], 1985, no. 11, pp. 56-57. (In Russian).
15. Ivanova E.S. Obosnovanie optimal’nykh srokov primeneniya gerbitsidov kross-spektra v pos-evakh kukuruzy v Zaural’e [The substantiation of the optimal terms of the use of herbicides of cross-spectrum in maize seedlings in Trans-Ural Region]. Kukuruza i sorgo [Corn and sorghum], 2016, no. 1, pp. 19-24. (In Russian).
16. Bagrintseva V.N., Kuznetsova S.V., Guba E.I. Poslevskhodovye gerbitsidy s pochvennym deistviem dlya kukuruzy [Postemergence herbicides with soil action for maize]. Kuku-ruza i sorgo [Corn and sorghum], 2015, no. 1, pp. 22-26. (In Russian).
17. Panfilov A.E., Saitov S.B. Effektivnost’ tien-karbazon-metila v kontrole zasorennosti kukuruzy [Efficiency of thiencarbazone-methyl in the control of weeds in maize]. Kukuruza i sorgo [Corn and sorghum], 2015, no. 3, pp. 15-19. (In Russian).
18. Makhan’kova T.A., Golubev A.S. Borushko P.I. Novyi gerbitsid Adengo dlya zashchity kukuruzy [New herbicide Adengo for maize protection]. Zashchita i karantin rastenii [Board of Plant Protection and Quarantine], 2013, no. 3, pp. 29-31. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Kostyuk A.V., Lukacheva N.G. Pre-emergence and postemergence application of herbicide Adengo in corn crops. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2019;49(1):11-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2019-1-2