Preview

Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science

Advanced search

Methodological foundations of economic assessment of yield of agricultural crops

https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2020-1-12

Abstract

The methodology for assessing levels of land productivity in terms of cost recovery is presented in theoretical and practical aspects. Based on the method for grading the yield of agricultural crops, methodological approaches have been proposed to substantiate the indicators of four productivity levels, which form four zones: unprofitable, moderate, rational and optimal yield. At the breakeven point, whereby revenue from sales and total production and sales costs are equal, the company does not incur losses, but does not receive profit either. After overcoming the breakeven point, the enterprise begins to make a profit with each subsequent unit of production. In the zone of moderate productivity, the company makes a profit which allows simple reproduction. In the zone of rational productivity of land, the profit of the enterprise provides for a partial upgrade of production, necessary in conditions of expanded reproduction. To conduct an extensive upgrade of the production base in conditions of expanded reproduction, the enterprise should reach the optimal level of yield. Formulas are given by which enterprises can forecast their profit per unit of area as a multiple of fixed costs. A number of examples for calculating different levels of crop yield based on a case study of a particular enterprise in 2018 are presented. The suggested method will allow researchers to substantiate economic evaluation of yield levels achieved for each type of crop cultivated at any given agricultural enterprise. This methodology will also provide specialists of agricultural enterprises, teachers and students of higher educational institutions with modern methodological tools for the economic assessment of yield levels for cultivated crops.

About the Author

D. M. Parmacli
Comrat State University
Moldova, Republic of

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

17 Galatan Str., Comrat 3800



References

1. Altukhov A.I. Sovershenstvovanie organizatsionno-ekonomicheskogo mekhanizma ustoichivogo razvitiya agropromyshlennogo proizvodstva [Improving the organizational and economic mechanism for the sustainable development of agricultural production]. Ekonomika sel'skokhozyaistvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatii [Economy of agricultural and processing enterprises], 2016, no. 7, pp. 2–11. (In Russian).

2. Rasskazova A., Zhdanova R. Osnovnye ponyatiya ekonomicheskoi effektivnosti upravleniya ustoichivym zemlepol'zovaniem [Basic concepts of economic efficiency of sustainable land management]. Mezhdunarodnyi sel'skokhozyaistvennyi zhurnal [International Agricultural Journal], 2017, no. 1, pp. 23–25. (In Russian).

3. Siptits S. Metody proektirovaniya effektivnykh i ustoichivykh variantov razmeshcheniya sel'skokhozyaistvennogo proizvodstva [Design methods for effective and sustainable options of agricultural production placement]. Mezhdunarodnyi sel'skokhozyaistvennyi zhurnal [International Agricultural Journal], 2017, no. 6, pp. 56–59. (In Russian).

4. Romanenko I.A., Evdokimova N.E. Tsenologicheskii podkhod pri analize ustoichivosti razmeshcheniya sel'skogo khozyaistva po regionam Rossii [Cenological approach to the analysis of the sustainability of agricultural distribution in the regions of Russia]. Mezhdunarodnyi sel'skokhozyaistvennyi zhurnal [International Agricultural Journal], 2017, no. 6, pp. 60–63. (In Russian).

5. Pavlik V.P. Problemy effektivnogo upravleniya sel'skokhozyastvennymi predpriyatiyami [Problems of effective management of agricultural enterprises]. Ekonomika APK [Economy of AIC], 2015, no. 11, pp. 85–88.

6. Shpikulyak O.G., Materins'ka O.A. Effektivnost' proizvodstva zerna sel'skokhozyastvennymi predpriyatiyami: teoretiko-metodologicheskiy aspekt [Grain production efficiency at agricultural enterprises: theoretical and methodological aspect]. Ekonomika APK [Economy of AIC], 2014, no. 12, pp. 42–49.

7. Marshall E., Aillery M., Malcolm S., Williams R. Agricultural Production under Climate Change: The Potential Impacts of Shifting Regional Water Balances in the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2015, vol. 97, is. 2, pp. 568–588. DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aau122.

8. Mugera A.W., Langemeier M.R., Ojede A. Contributions of Productivity and Relative Price Changes to Farm-level Profitability Change. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2016, vol. 98, is. 4, pp. 1210–1229. DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aaw029.

9. Chrastinová Z., Burianová V. Economic efficiency of Slovak agriculture and its commodity sectors. Agricultural Economics Czech, 2012, vol. 58, no. 2. pp. 92–99. DOI: 10.17221/162/2010-AGRICECON.

10. Stratan. Moldovan agri-food sector dilemma: east or west? Economics of agriculture, 2014, no. 3, pp. 615–632.

11. Doga V., Bajura T. Strategia de dezvoltare a sectorului agroalimentar in perioada anilor 2006–2015. Еconomie si deyvoltare rurala imdrp, 2016, no. 24, 74 p.

12. Timofti E., Popa D. Eficienţa mecanismului economic în sectorul agrar. Chişinău: Complexul Editorial al IEFS. 2016, 343 p.

13. Dudoglo T.D. Upravlenie zemel'nym potentsialom regiona: voprosy teorii, metodiki, praktiki [Land potential management in the region: theory, methodology, practice]. Komrat: Centrografic Publ., 2017, 167 p.

14. Parmakli D.M., Todorich L.P., Dudoglo T.D., Yanioglo A.I. Effektivnost' zemlepol'zovaniya: teoriya, metodika, praktika [Land use efficiency: theory, methods, practice]. Komrat: Centrografic Publ., 2015. 274 p.


Review

For citations:


Parmacli D.M. Methodological foundations of economic assessment of yield of agricultural crops. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2020;50(1):101-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2020-1-12

Views: 383


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0370-8799 (Print)
ISSN 2658-462X (Online)