The dependence of the biological efficiency of soybean seed treatment with fungicidal seed dressings of different mechanisms of action on the conditions of the year in the forest-steppe of Western Siberia
https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2025-10-13
Abstract
The results of a study on the assessment of the biological effectiveness of fungicidal soybean seed dressings with different mechanisms of action, taking into account the conditions of the year, are presented. The objective of the study was to establish the influence of seed dressings with different mechanisms of action and seasonal conditions on the development of soybean root rot in field conditions. The studies were conducted in 2020–2024 in the northern forest-steppe conditions of the Novosibirsk region using the generally accepted methods. The field experiment was carried out in four replicates. For the research, the systemic seed dressing agents Bariton (prothioconazole 37.5 g/l + fluoxastrobin 37.5 g/l) at a rate of 1.5 l/t and Scarlet (imazalil + tebuconazole (100 + 60 g/l)) 0.4 l/t were used, as well as contact preparations Maxim (fludioxonil 25 g/l) 2.0 l/t and Delit Pro (pyraclostrobin 200 g/l) 0.5 l/t. On average, over 5 years, the development of root rots in the first half of the growing season exceeded the harmfulness threshold by 2.5–5.3 times, and in the second – by 2.0–3.6 times. The maximum values were recorded in 2022 and 2023 with the highest hydrothermal stress. On average, over 5 years, the biological efficiency of seed treatment reached 67.2% in the germination phase and 36.7% in the flowering phase in the variant with the Maxim preparation at 2 l/t. In conditions of moisture deficiency, contact preparations had a higher biological effectiveness against soybean root rot, while in the years with sufficient or excessive moisture, systemic preparations had a higher biological effectiveness.
About the Authors
I. A. KamenevRussian Federation
Ilya A. Kamenev, Post-graduate Student
Novosibirsk
E. Yu. Toropova
Russian Federation
Elena Yu. Toropova, Chair Professor, Doctor of Science in Biology, Professor
Novosibirsk
References
1. Dega L.A., Butovec E.S., Luk'yanchuk L.M. Soybeans: diseases and pests. Moscow, 2022, 127 p. (In Russian).
2. Rezvickij T.H., Tikidzhan R.A., Pozdnyakova A.V. Main diseases on soybean crops. Scientific Heritage, 2021, no. 59-2 (59), pp. 6–8. (In Russian).
3. Bezmutko S.V., Kozhevnikova I.A. Influence of fungicides on the phytosanitary state of experimental soybean cultivation in Primorsky Krai. Agrarnyj vestnik Primor'ya = Agrarian Bulletin of Primorye, 2018, no. 4 (12), pp. 33–36. (In Russian).
4. Kurilova D.A., Bushneva N.A. The assessment of a complex treatment of soybean seeds with fungicides and inoculator. Maslichnye kul'tury = Oilseed crops, 2023, no. 3 (195), pp. 76–82. (In Russian). DOI: 10.25230/2412-608X-2023-3195-76-82.
5. Malahova S.D., Nefed'eva E.E., Bajbekov R.F., Belopuhov S.L., Zor'kina O.V. Evaluation of the phytotoxic effect and biological effectiveness of a drug based on thiabendazole and fludioxonil for the protection of industrial crops. Zemledelie = Zemledelie, 2024, no. 5, pp. 42–47. (In Russian).
6. Semenova E.A., Kolesnikova T.P. Application of seed treatment fungicides for growing soybean in the Amur Oblast. Zashchita i karantin rastenij = Plant Protection and Quarantine, 2023, no. 2, pp. 10–13. (In Russian).
7. Kuz'min A.A. Features of the spread of soybean diseases in the Amur region. Dal'nevostochnyj agrarnyj vestnik = Far Eastern Agrarian Bulletin, 2023, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 31–44. (In Russian).
8. Toropova E.Yu., Kamenev I.A. Comparative assessment of the effectiveness of contact and systemic fungicides for treating soybean seeds in the forest-steppe of the Novosibirsk Region. Vestnik NGAU = Bulletin of NSAU, 2024, no. 1 (70), pp. 161–168. (In Russian).
9. Toropova E.Yu., Kamenev I.A. Pre-sown preparations for soybean seeds in the forest-steppe of Western Siberia. Zashchita i karantin rastenij = Plant Protection and Quarantine, 2022, no. 2, pp. 10–16. (In Russian).
10. Dem'yanenko E.V., Fedorova Z.S., Malahova S.D., Trunov V.V. Phytosanitary condition of soybean crops in the Kaluga region. Izvestiya Nizhnevolzhskogo agrouniversitetskogo kompleksa = Izvestia of the Lower Volga Agro-University Complex, 2024, no. 4 (76), pp. 122–132. (In Russian).
11. Pereira R.C., Da. Silva B.G., Braccini A.L. Industrial treatment of soybean seeds subjected to high volumes of fungicides, insecticides, biostimulants and micronutrients during storage. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2022, no. 16 (04), pp. 539–544.
12. Sagarika M., Amrate P.K., Yadav V.K., Shrivastava M.K. Exploring potential of new generation fungicides as seed dresser in combating early infection of Macrophomina phaseolina in Soybean. Indian Phytopathology, 2023, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 1045–1053.
13. Kul'kov S.S., Azarov V.B. Formation of soybean productivity in modern agricultural technologies in the Central Black Earth region. Innovacii v APK: problemy i perspektivy = Innovations in agricultural complex: problems and perspectives, 2023, no. 4 (40), pp. 100–105. (In Russian).
14. Toropova E.Yu., Zaharov A.F., Stecov G.Ya., Sanarov A.G. Seed treatment of grain and leguminous crops. Prilozhenie k zhurnalu Zashchita i karantin rastenij = Supplement to the journal Plant Protection and Quarantine, 2020, no. 1, pp. 37 (1)–72 (36). (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Kamenev I.A., Toropova E.Yu. The dependence of the biological efficiency of soybean seed treatment with fungicidal seed dressings of different mechanisms of action on the conditions of the year in the forest-steppe of Western Siberia. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2025;55(10):119–124. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2025-10-13






