FORMULATION OF NOVELTY OF RESEARCH RESULTS, THEIR IMPORTANCE FOR SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
Abstract
General provisions of the methodology for formulating novelty of research results and scientific and practical importance of the results in the field of agricultural engineering are identified. New knowledge is undertaken as an assumption in the form of scientific hypotheses. After work has been done, novelty of results obtained for the first time is formulated. The essence of novelty of the results obtained needs to be connected with their importance for science as well as with practical importance. There are given key parameters and indicators to evaluate scientific importance of research results: suggested ideas, arguments, evidence, which confirm or deny the ideas; substantiation of the theory presentation elements: axioms, hypotheses, scientific evidence, and conclusions; formulating laws or regularities of the general concept as a whole; disclosure of essential manifestations of the theory: contradictions, inconsistencies, opportunities, difficulties, and dangers; highlighting new issues to be further investigated; characteristics of the phenomena of reality, which form the basis for practical actions in a particular area; establishing relations of a given phenomenon with others. The practical significance is evaluated by the following indicators: defining a scope of application for the theory to be practically used in a field, where this pattern, idea, concept is manifested; creation of a normative model to effectively apply new knowledge in reality; recommendations for organizing activities on a higher level; defining regulatory norms and requirements within the framework of the optimal activities of an individual and a team in a field of research. Scientific results of theses should be verified under conditions closest to reality, and confirmed by making decisions about their implementation in practice.
About the Author
G. E. CHEPURINRussian Federation
Krasnoobsk, Novosibirsk Region, 630501, Russia
RAS Corresponding Member, Research DirectorReferences
1. Ado A.V., Frolov I.T. Filosofskii slovar’. – M.: Izd-vo polit. lit-ry, 1980. – 444 s.
2. Kondakov N.I. Logicheskii slovar’-spravochnik. – M.: Nauka, 1975. – 720 s.
3. Novikov A.M., Novikov D.A. Metodologiya. – M.: Sinteg, 2007. – 668 s.
4. Bazhenov L.P. Sovremennaya nauchnaya gipoteza // Materialisticheskaya dialektika i metody estestvennykh nauk. – M.: Nauka, 1968. – 608 s.
5. Ludchenko A.A., Ludchenko Ya.A., Primyak T.A. Osnovy nauchnykh issledovanii: ucheb. posobie. – Kiev: Znaniya, 2000. – 113 s.
6. Ruzavin G.I. Metodologiya nauchnogo issledovaniya. – M.: YuNITI, 1999. – 317 s.
7. Kuzin F.A. Kandidatskie dissertatsii. Metodika napisaniya, pravila oformleniya i poryadok zashchity. – M.: Os’-89, 1999. – 208 s.
8. Novikov A.M. Kak rabotat’ nad dissertatsiei: posobie dlya nachinayushchego pedagoga- issledovatelya. – M.: EVGES, 1999. – 144 s.
9. Gavrilov T.A., Khoroshevskii V.F. Bazy znanii intellektual’nykh sistem. – SPb: Piter, 2000. – 358 s.
10. Chepurin G.E. Formulirovanie osnovnykh metodologicheskikh kharakteristik nauchnogo issledovaniya: metod. posobie. – Novosibirsk, 2012. – 36 s.
11. Chepurin G.E. Opredelenie nauchnoi problemy, aktual’nosti temy, ob"ekta i predmeta issledovaniya v oblasti agroinzhenernoi nauki. // Sib. vestn. s.-kh. nauki. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 89–94.
12. Kraevskii V.V., Polonskii V.M. Metodologiya dlya pedagoga: teoriya i praktika. – Volgograd: Peremena, 2001. – 324 s.
13. Yudin E.G. Sistemnyi podkhod i printsip deyatel’ nosti. – M.: Nauka, 1978. – 390 s.
14. Mashinostroenie. Terminologiya: sprav. posobie. – M.: Izd-vo standartov, 1989. – Vyp. 2.– 432 s.
15. Global’naya ekonomika: entsiklopediya / pod red. I.I. Kulikova. – M.: Finansy i statistika, 2011. – 920 s.
Review
For citations:
CHEPURIN G.E. FORMULATION OF NOVELTY OF RESEARCH RESULTS, THEIR IMPORTANCE FOR SCIENCE AND PRACTICE. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2017;47(4):88-93. (In Russ.)