ASSESMENT OF HERBICIDE TANK MIXTURES OF CONCEPT, HARMONY AND COMMAND FOR SOYA SOWS
https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2018-1-3
Abstract
There are reported test results of biological and economic efficiency of herbicide tank mixtures of Concept 1.0 l/ha + Harmony 0,005 kg/ha, Concept 0.8 l/ha + Command 1.0 l/ha and Concept 1.0 l/ha + Command 0.8 l/ha carried out in 2015-2016. The researches took place in the soybean crops on the meadow brown podzolized soils of Primorsky Territory. Concept of 1.0 l/ha norm was used as standard. It showed high activity against annual grass weeds (Echinochloa crusgalli, Setaria glauca,Setaria viridis, Eriochloa villosa), dicotyledonous annuals (Abutilon theophrasti, Sigesbeckia pubescens, Elsholtzia pseudocristata) and perennial (Sonchus arvensis, Artemisia vulgaris) species. Concept 1.0 l/ha + Command 0.8 l/ha and Concept 0.8 l/ha + Command 1.0 l/ha mixtures promoted a significant increase in herbicidal effect on Ambrosia artemisiifolia, Cirsium setosum, Artemisia vulgaris, Commelina communis and Equisetum arvense. Tank mixture processing with Concept 1.0 l/ha + Harmony 0.005 kg/ha increased significantly inhibition of Artemisia vulgaris and Cirsium setosum. There was registered Acalypha australis to be resistant to Concept and its tank mixtures with Harmony and Command. In comparison with the untreated control, the yield increase of soybean seeds in the variants of Concept of 1.0 l/ha, Concept of 1.0 l/ha + Harmony 0.005 kg/ha, Concept of 1.0 l/ha + Command 0.8 l/ha and Concept 0.8 l/ha + Command 1.0 l/ha was of 0.26; 0.31; 0.43 and 0.48 t/ha average for two years; economic efficiency was of 2.9; 3.9; 4.3 and 5.5 thousand rubles/ha, respectively. In conditions of southern Far East, Concept herbicide of 1.0 l/ha norm should be applied taking into account the weed species composition and Command process solution must be added in the case of Ambrosia artemisiifolia predominance.
About the Authors
Z. V. Basay
Far Eastern Research Institute of Plant Protection
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Senior Researcher
42a Mira St, Kamen-Rybolov, Khankaiskiy District, Primorsky Territory, 692682, Russia
V. N. Morokhovets
Far Eastern Research Institute of Plant Protection
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Biologiy, Director
42a Mira St, Kamen-Rybolov, Khankaiskiy District, Primorsky Territory, 692682, Russia
T. V. Morokhovets
Far Eastern Research Institute of Plant Protection
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Leading Researcher
42a Mira St, Kamen-Rybolov, Khankaiskiy District, Primorsky Territory, 692682, Russia
T. V. Shterbolova
Far Eastern Research Institute of Plant Protection
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Researcher
42a Mira St, Kamen-Rybolov, Khankaiskiy District, Primorsky Territory, 692682, Russia
S. S. Vostrikova
Far Eastern Research Institute of Plant Protection
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Junior Researcher
42a Mira St, Kamen-Rybolov, Khankaiskiy District, Primorsky Territory, 692682, Russia
References
1. Vashchenko A.P., Mudrik N.V., Fisenko P. P., Dega L.A., Chaika N.V., Ka-pustin Yu. S. Soya na Dal’nem Vostoke. – Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 2010. – 435 s.
2. Klykov A.G., Kim I.V. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i puti innovatsionnogo razvitiya agrarnoi nauki na Dal’nem Vostoke //Vestnik DVO RAN. 2017. – № 3. – S. 5–14.
3. Spiridonov Yu.Ya. Metodicheskie osnovy izucheniya vredonosnosti sornykh rastenii // Agrokhimiya. 2007. – № 3. – S. 68–77.
4. Morokhovets V.N., Morokhovets T. V., Basai Z.V. Rezul’taty izucheniya ef- fektivnosti gerbitsida Fabian // Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK. 2014. – T. 28, № 12. – S. 20–23.
5. Prodolzhit’ izuchenie effektivnosti gerbitsidov dlya razrabotki regla-mentov ikh primeneniya v posevakh sel’skokhozyaistvennykh kul’tur v usloviyakh yuga Dal’nego Vostoka: otchet o NIR (promezhutochnyi) / – FGBNU DVNIIZR. – Kamen’-Rybolov, 2016. – 37 s.
6. Morokhovets T.V., Morokhovets V. N., Vostrikova S.S., Basai Z.V., Shterbolova T. V. Otsenka obiliya sornykh rastenii v posevakh sel’skokhozyaistven-nykh kul’tur Primorskogo kraya // Uspekhi sovremennoi nauki. 2017. – S. 233–244.
7. Ret’man S.V., Borzykh A.I., Kislykh T.N., Strigun A.A., Storchous I.N., Shevchuk O. V. Sistema meropriyatii po zashchite soi // Zashchita soi. ( Pri-lozh. k zhur. «Zashchita i karantin rastenii») – 2015. – № 4. – S. 19–78
8. Spisok pestitsidov i agrokhimikatov, razreshennykh k primeneniyu na ter-ritorii Rossiiskoi Federatsii 2015 god: Spravochnoe izdanie. – M.: AO «Pervaya obraztsovaya tipografiya», 2015. – 720 s.
9. Morokhovets T.V., Morokhovets V.N., Basai Z.V., Shterbolova T.V. Otsenka effektivnosti gerbitsida Kontsept v posevakh soi v Primorskom krae // Agrokhimicheskii vestnik. 2016. – № 6. – S. 43–46.
10. Chaika A.K., Vashchenko A.A., Tsarenko V.P. i dr. Sistema vedeniya agropromyshlennogo proizvodstva Primorskogo kraya. – Novosibirsk, 2001. – 364 s.
11. Chaika A.K. Adaptivnye i progressivnye tekhnologii vozdelyvaniya soi i kukuruzy na Dal’nem Vostoke: Metod. rekomendatsii / pod red. A.K. Chaika. – Vladivostok: Dal’nauka. 2009. – 122 s.
12. Nikitin N.V., Spiridonov Yu.Ya., Shestakov V.G. Nauchno-prakticheskie aspekty tekhnologii primeneniya sovremennykh gerbitsidov v rastenievod-stve. – M.: Pechatnyi gorod, 2010. – 200 s.
13. Dospekhov B.A. Metodika polevogo opyta. – M.: Kolos, 1973. – 335 s.
14. Spiridonov Yu.Ya., Larina G.E., Shestakov V.G. Metodicheskoe rukovod-stvo po izucheniyu gerbitsidov, primenyaemykh v rastenievodstve. – M.: Pe-chatnyi gorod, 2009. – 252 s.
15. GOST R 52325. – 2005. Semena sel’skokhozyaistvennykh rastenii. Sortovye i posevnye kachestva. Obshchie tekhnicheskie usloviya. – M.: Standartinform, 2005. – 19 s.
Review
For citations:
Basay Z.V., Morokhovets V.N., Morokhovets T.V., Shterbolova T.V., Vostrikova S.S. ASSESMENT OF HERBICIDE TANK MIXTURES OF CONCEPT, HARMONY AND COMMAND FOR SOYA SOWS. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2018;48(1):20-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2018-1-3
Views:
1318
Email this article 