INFLUENCE OF SOIL PROCESSING ON CHERNOZEM AGROPHYSICAL STATE AND SPRING WHEAT PRODUCTIVITY
https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2018-1-6
Abstract
Results are given from evaluation study (2013–2015) of basic processing methods influence on soil agrophysical state and spring wheat productivity. Shallow medium-loamy chernozem of Krasnoyarsk forest-steppe was under study. The soil under basic processing was characterized with normal composition (0.96–1.02 g/ сm3) and perfect structure of 0–20 сm layer on agronomical valuable aggregates content (70–71 %). Experiment scheme included three variants of tillage: dump plowing of black steam with PLN- 4–35 to 20–22 cm depth (control); autumn disc harrowing of black steam with Rubin 9600KU cultivator to 10–12 сm depth (minimal processing); chemical steam and direct sowing with John Deer seed drill (zero processing). There is established that basic processing type defined the character of seasonal soil density dynamics (Сv=1–25 %) and structural composition (Cv = 28 %). Optimal wheat productivity was obtained under dump plowing cultivation and minimal processing (24–25 c/ha). Direct wheat sowing contributed to soil density increase by 0.06–0.04 g/ сm3 with optimal parameters maintenance and reduced spring wheat productivity by 0.6–0.7 t/ha in comparison with the dump plowing and minimal processing
About the Authors
N. L. KurachenkoRussian Federation
Doctor in Biology, Professor
90 Prospect Mira St, Krasnoyarsk, 660049, Russia
A. S. Kolesnikov
Russian Federation
Postgraduate
90 Prospect Mira St, Krasnoyarsk, 660049, Russia
V. N. Romanov
Russian Federation
Doctor of Agricultural Sciences
66 Prospect Svobodny St, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russia
References
1. Drepa E.B., Golub’ A.S. Fizicheskie svoistva pochvy pri primenenii tekhnologii No-Till // Vestn. APK Stavropol’ya. – 2014. – № 4.– S. 181–185.
2. Medvedev V.V. Izmenenie agrofizicheskikh svoistv chernozemov v usloviyakh intensivnogo zemledeliya // Problemy pochvovedeniya. – M.: Nauka, 1982. – S.21–24.
3. Bulygin S.Yu., Komarova T.D. K otsenke vliyaniya mekhanicheskoi obrabotki na pochvu // Pochvovedenie. – 1990. – № 6. – S. 135–138.
4. Aleksandrova L.N. Laboratorno-prakticheskie zanyatiya po pochvovedeniyu. – L.: Kolos, 1967. – 350 s.
5. Metodicheskoe rukovodstvo po izucheniyu pochvennoi struktury. – L.: Kolos, 1969. – 430 s.
6. Agrokhimicheskie metody issledovaniya pochv. Pod red. A.V. Sokolova. – M.: Nauka, 1975. – 487 s.
7. Dmitriev E.A. Matematicheskaya statistika v pochvovedenii. – M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1995. – 319 s.
8. Utkaeva V.F. Ustoichivost’ strukturnogo sostoyaniya pochv k antropogennym vozdeistviyam //Ustoichivost’ pochv k estestvennym i antropogennym vozdeistviyam. – M.: Pochvennyi institut im. V.V. Dokuchaeva RASKhN, 2002. – S. 15.
9. Perfil’ev N.V., Vysotina O.A. Vliyanie plotnosti pochvy pri razlichnykh sistemakh osnovnoi obrabotki na urozhainost’ yachmenya // Sib. vestn. s.-kh. nauki. – 2016. – № 1. – S. 5–12.
10. Khramtsov I.F. Resursosberegayushchie tekhnologii proizvodstva zerna v zapadnoi Sibiri // Zemledelie. – 2009. – № 4. – S. 5–7.
11. Shurupov V.G., Polous V.S. Vliyanie sposobov osnovnoi obrabotki pochvy i drugikh faktorov na zasorennost’ v zvene sevooborota // Zemledelie. – 2011. – № 1. –S. 28–30.
12. Sineshchekov V.E., Krasnoperov A.G., Krasnoperova E.M. Sornye rasteniya zernovykh fitotsenozov v pochvozashchitnom zemledelii. – Novosibirsk: Sib.otd. SibNIIZKhIM RASKhN, 2005.– 120 s.
13. Oznobikhina L.A., Shakhova O.A. Vidovoi sostav sornykh rastenii po resursosberegayushchim tekhnologiyam osnovnoi obrabotki v Tyumenskoi oblasti // APK: regiony Rossii. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 41–43.
Review
For citations:
Kurachenko N.L., Kolesnikov A.S., Romanov V.N. INFLUENCE OF SOIL PROCESSING ON CHERNOZEM AGROPHYSICAL STATE AND SPRING WHEAT PRODUCTIVITY. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2018;48(1):44-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2018-1-6