THE MAIN FACTORS INFLUENCING EFFICIENCY OF SPRING COMMON WHEAT AGROCENOSIS

The paper presents the results of research (2015– 2018) into the main factors affecting efficiency of agrocenosis of spring common wheat, cultivar Siberian Alliance, with various systems of soil tillage and renewable bio-resources in a grain-fallow rotation. The research was conducted in the northern forest-steppe of Kuznetsk Depression in a threecourse grain-fallow crop rotation (fallow-wheatpeas-barley, barley intercropped with melilot) in a long-term stationary experiment. Various soil tillage systems were applied (deep moldboard, deep combined, minimum combined, minimum moldboard) preceded by bare fallow and green-manured fallow with rape and melilot. The soil of the experimental plot was leached chernozem. Crops of spring common wheat were sown with all types of soil tillage systems by the tillage and sowing machine Tom’5.1. It was revealed that the main factor influencing the yield of spring common wheat is water availability in the planting periods – full tillering, (r = 0.9579), beginning of earring – yellow ripeness, (r = 0.9611; R = 0.9500). A positive effect on wheat productivity was made by cellulosolytic activity and soil structure. The direct correlation between these factors and the crop yield was established, r = 0.6366 – 0.7298 and r = 0.6343 – 0.7103 respectively. A negative effect on the yield of wheat was made by the development of root decay (Bipolaris sorokiniana (Sacc.) Shoem), (r = – 0.4808). It was established that alongside the above-mentioned fac tors, the significant effect on productivity of spring common wheat was made by the systems of soil tillage (72.4%,) and the predecessor (22.0 %). The optimum conditions in agrocenosis of spring common wheat for formation of its yield during the years of research proved to be created by green-manured fallow (with rape) with minimum moldboard and deep moldboard soil tillage (2.72 and 2.78 t/ha respectively), which is 0.55 and 0.51 t/ha higher compared to analogous soil tillage systems preceded by bare fallow – control. Minimum moldboard soil tillage has an economic advantage over others with profitability of 193.6% and production cost at 5,000 rubles per 1 ton of grain.

1. Petrovsky N.V., Romanov V.N., Litau V.M., Ivchenko V.K. Vliyanie obrabotki pochvy na ehlementy plodorodiya i urozhajnost’ pshenicy v lesostepnoj zone Krasnoyarskogo kraya [The impact of soil tillage on elements of fertility and productivity of wheat in a forest-steppe zone of Krasnoyarsk Territory]. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK [Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC], 2016, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 77–79. (In Russian).

2. Barin A. A., Loshchinina A.E. Vliyanie obrabotki pochvy v komplekse s primeneniem udobrenij i gerbicidov na urozhajnost’ kul’tur sevooborota [The impact of soil processing alongside the use of fertilizers and herbicides on productivity of crops in a crop rotation] // Zemledelie [Zemledelie], 2015, no. 7, рр. 17– 20. (In Russian).

3. Renyov E.P., Eryomin D.I. Vodopronicaemost’ pahotnogo chernozyoma vyshchelochennogo lesostepnoj zone Zaural’ya [Water permeability of the arable leached chernozem in the foreststeppe zone of the Trans-Ural region]. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK [Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC, 2017, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 18–21. (In Russian).

4. Naimi O.I., Bezuglov O.S., Poliyenko E.A., Kutserubov O.Yu. Vosproizvodstvo plodorodiya chernozyoma obyknovennogo karbonatnogo pri vnesenii solomy i guminovyh preparatov [Reproduction of fertility of ordinary carbonaceous chernozem by using straw and humic medicine] Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK [Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC], 2018, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 11–16. (In Russian).

5. Kislov A.V., Glinushkin A.P., Kashcheev A.V. Agroekologicheskie osnovy povysheniya ustojchivosti zemledeliya v stepnoj zone [Agroecological basis of increase in stability of agriculture in a steppe zone] // Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK [Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC], 2018, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 9– 13. (In Russian).

6. Kiryushin V.I. Minimalizaciya obrabotki pochvy: perspektivy i protivorechiya [Minimizing soil tillage: prospects and contradictions]. Zemledelie [Zemledelie], 2006, no. 5, pp. 12– 14. (In Russian).

7. Dospekhov B.A. Metodika polevogo opyta [Technique of field experiment]. M. Kolos [M.: Ear], 1985, 351 p. (In Russian).

8. Sorokin O.D. Prikladnaya statistika na komp,yutere [Applied statistics on the computer]. – Krasnoobsk: RPO SO RASKhN Publ., 2004. 162 p. (In Russian).

9. Yakushev V.P., Mikhaylenko V.A., Dragavtsev V.A. Agrotekhnologicheskie i selekcionnye rezervy povysheniya urozhaev zernovyh kul’tur v Rossii [Agrotechnological and selection reserves of increase in grain yields of grain crops in Russia]. Sel’skohozyajstvennaya biologiya. [Agricultural biology], 2015, vol. 50. pp. 550– 560. (In Russian).

10. Lapshinov N.A., Pakul V.N., Bozhanova G.V., Kuksheneva T.P. Nakoplenie i sokhranenie produktivnoj vlagi v resursosberegayushhih tehnologiyah [Accumulation and preservation of productive moisture in resource-saving technologies]. Mezhdunarodnyj nauchno issledovatelskij zhurnal [Research Journal of International Studies], 2013, no. 4 (11), pp. 131–134. (In Russian).

11. Cheverdin Yu.I., Saprykin S.V., Cheverdin A.Yu., Ryabtsev A.N. Transformacii fizicheskih pokazatelej chernozyomov agrogennogo vozdejstviya [Transformations of physical characteristics of chernozems with agrogenic influence]. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK [Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC], 2016, vol. 31, no. 3. pp. 5–12. (In Russian).

12. Irmulatov B.R., Vlasenko A.N. Povyshenie vlagobespechennosti agrocenozov i urozhajnost’ kul’tur v usloviyah Pavlodarskogo Priirtysh’ya [Increase in water availability of agrocenosis and crop productivity in the conditions of the Pavlodar, Irtysh Land]. Sibirskij vestnik sel’skohozyajstvennoj nauki [Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science], 2017, no. 2 (255), vol. 47. pp. 5–12. (In Russian).

13. Bulatkin G.A Kovalyova A.E. Cellyulozoliticheskaya aktivnost’ seryh lesnyh pochv [Cellulosolytic activity of gray forest soil]. Pochvovedenie [Eurasian Soil Science], 1984, no. 11, pp. 67. (In Russian).

14. Vasilyeva N.V., Sineshchyokov V.E. Prichiny usileniya rasprostraneniya kornevymi gnilyami vskhodov yarovoj pshenicy v lesostepi Priob’ya [The reasons of root decay prevalence in shoots of spring wheat in the forest-steppe of Priobye]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Bulletin of NGAU], 2016, no. 4(41). pp. 13–17. (In Russian).

15. Galeyev R.R., Samarin I.S. Osobennosti formirovaniya urozhajnosti sortov yarovoj myagkoj pshenicy pri intensivnoj tekhnologii proizvodstva v lesostepi Novosibirskogo Priob’ya [Features of yield formation of common spring wheat varieties at the intensive production technology in the forest-steppe of Novosibirsk Priobye]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Bulletin of NGAU], 2016, no. 4(41), pp. 7–12. (In Russian).